Landlord Ordered to Fix Safety Issues in Residential Building
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord to fix safety issues in a residential building after the city council applied for a remediation order under the Building Safety Act 2022.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord must remediate safety defects in a relevant building under the Building Safety Act 2022.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord to remediate safety defects in a residential building under the Building Safety Act 2022.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord to remediate safety defects in a residential building under the Building Safety Act 2022 after the city council applied for a remediation order.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/BSA/2024/0602 Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants : [redacted] Representative : Mr [COUNSEL], [NAME] (Ref: WES-551939000662H) Respondent : [redacted] Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] (authorised agent) Mr [COUNSEL] (Building Manager) Ms [COUNSEL] (Solicitor, acting in capacity as litigation friend and not through her firm)
Type of application : For a remediation order under section 123 of the Building Safety Act 2022 Tribunal : Judge N [NAME] [NAME] (Building Safety Expert) Date of Hearing : 10 December 2024 Date of Order : 12 December 2024
REMEDIATION ORDER
UPON considering the [NAME]’s (‘the Applicant’) application for a remediation order under section 123 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (‘BSA22’)
2
AND UPON hearing from Mr [NAME], Principal Officer, [NAME], for the Applicant, and Mr [COUNSEL], authorised agent for [COMPANY] ([RESPONDENT] in Kuwait) (‘the Respondent’) AND UPON Mr [RESPONDENT] confirming his express authority AND UPON the Respondent admitting that it is the relevant landlord, that the Building is a relevant building, that the identified defects are relevant defects that were caused or in consequence of relevant works, and that the Applicant is a relevant person within the meaning of the BSA22 AND UPON the parties agreeing to a remediation order in light of the evidence on both sides, including: (a) Cluttons Scope of Works 20 Feb 2018; (b) Tetra Fire Risk Assessment 9 April 2018; (c) [COMPANY] report on ACM 4 April 2018; (d) Marshall Fire, 27 January 2023 Fire Strategy; (e) Marshall Fire FRAEW 2 February 2023 using PAS9980 methodology; (f) the [COMPANY] dated 3 May 2024. AND UPON considering the parties’ submissions AND UPON considering the schedule of works (‘the Works’) accompanying this order will remediate the relevant defects in 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the Building’) specified in the application AND UPON the Respondent undertaking to complete a full intrusive investigation before and/or during the course of the works, and that any further defects that come to light will be addressed appropriately in the course of the works IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Respondent shall remedy the relevant defects at the Building summarised in the attached Schedule of Defects (‘the Schedule of Defects) by the time specified in paragraph 2 below.
2. The Respondent shall comply with paragraph 1 above by completing the works by no later than 31 October 2026.
3. The parties have permission to apply in relation to paragraphs 1 and 2 and the Schedule of Defects. In particular, the Respondent has permission to apply:
(a) To be permitted to undertake different Works to those specified by this Order, if it is revealed by investigation and analysis by a suitably qualified consultant that reasonable alternative works will remedy the relevant defects; and (b) To extend time for compliance with this Order.
3
4. Any such application must be made using the Tribunal’s form Order1. The application must be supported by detailed evidence explaining the reason for the application, and a proposed draft order setting out the variation sought. Permission is given hereby (without the need to apply further) for the parties to rely on relevant expert evidence in support of their respective positions in the application. The application must also identify a realistic time estimate for the hearing of the application.
5. The Respondent must: (a) notify the Tribunal and the Applicant that it has complied with this Order, (b) provide a copy of (i) the completion certificate obtained in accordance with paragraph 6 below, and (ii) the FRAEW and EWS1 obtained in accordance with paragraph 7 below within one month of the certified date of practical completion of the Works.
6. The Respondent must obtain a completion certificate issued under Regulation 44 of the Builder (Higher-risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023 (or such other Building Control approval as is appropriate at the time of completion of the Works)
7. The Respondent must carry out the Works and remedy the specified Relevant Defects in compliance with the Building Regulations applicable at the time the remedial work is carried out, so that the Relevant Defects no longer exist and such that a post-Works Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW) pursuant to PAS9980:2022 should not prevent a satisfactory Form EWS1:External Wall Fire Review (EWS1) from being issued. The Respondent shall obtain a FRAEW and EWS1 which meet these requirements.
8. By section 123(7) of the BSA22, this Order is enforceable with the permission of the County Court in the same way as if it were an Order of that Court.
Tribunal Judge: [NAME]: 12 December 2024
4
Schedule of Defects 1 Combustible cladding and/or insulation (including External Category 3 ACM)
2 Missing and/or defective cavity barriers (including around door/window openings)
3 Firestopping (including around ventilation ductwork penetrations and the internal apartment walls and floors)
4 Fire doors (including fire resistance, seals and strips)
5 Fire detection systems (including AOV)
6 Non fire-resisting glazing around external escape
7 Absence of dry riser
8 No wayfinding signage
9 No secure premises information box
5
Schedule of Works 1 Undertake intrusive survey within the apartments and common parts including in particular in respect of ductwork, penetrations/fire-stopping and compartmentation
2 Undertake a FRAEW using PAS9980 methodology in respect of all wall types at the Building
3 Undertake a fire door survey for apartment and common area doors, to include both fire resistance and stopping
4 Instruct competent person(s) to carry out works of remediation to resolve:
(a) the defects identified in the Schedule of Defects, and
(b) any further defects identified in the surveys/reports identified in 1, 2 and 3 above
5 The Respondent must carry out the Works and remedy the Defects in compliance with the Building Regulations applicable at the time the remedial work is carried out, so that the relevant defects no longer exist.
6 Make good any damage to the Building caused by or as a result of the Works
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Remediation Order for Building Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fire Safety Remediation Order Granted in First-tier Tribunal Case
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Orders Landlord to Remedy Fire Safety Defects at Somerville Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Remediation Order for Defective Building
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Remediation Order Under Building Safety Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Extends Deadline for Building Remediation Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Landlord to Remedy Building Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fire Safety Remediation Order Granted for Combustible Materials
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Landlord to Remediate Fire Safety Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Remediation of Building Safety Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Remediation Order for Building Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Landlord to Remedy Fire Safety Defects
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The respondent admitted it is the relevant landlord and the building is a relevant building.
- The identified defects were admitted to be relevant defects caused by relevant works.
- The applicant was confirmed to be a relevant person under the Building Safety Act 2022.
- Both parties agreed to a remediation order based on the evidence presented.
- The respondent undertook to conduct a full intrusive investigation and address any further defects found.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision ordered the landlord to remediate safety defects in a residential building.
Who was involved?
The city council applied for a remediation order, and the landlord was ordered to make the necessary repairs.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence presented and the provisions of the Building Safety Act 2022.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Building Safety Act 2022 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the identification of safety defects and the requirement to remediate them under the Building Safety Act 2022.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the city council.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may seek a remediation order if there are safety defects in a residential building.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included fire risk assessments and reports on the condition of the building's exterior walls.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving building safety regulations.
