First-tier Tribunal Orders Remediation of Building Safety Defects
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord of Oyster Bay Apartments to fix safety issues under the Building Safety Act 2022. The order includes specific deadlines for remediation works.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord must remedy relevant building safety defects as ordered by the First-tier Tribunal under section 123 of the Building Safety Act 2022.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal issued a remediation order under the Building Safety Act 2022 for defects in Oyster Bay Apartments.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal issued a remediation order under the Building Safety Act 2022 for defects in Oyster Bay Apartments, Poole. The respondent admitted to relevant defects and agreed to remedy them by August 14, 2030.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
HAV/00HQ/BSA/2025/0002
Property
:
1-31 Oyster Bay Apartments, Sterte, Poole [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] Council
Representative
:
BCPC Legal Department
Respondent: [redacted]
:
[COMPANY] of Application
:
Application for a Remediation Order Section 123 Building Safety Act 2022.
Tribunal Member(s)
:
Judge J Dobson
Date of Order
:
10th April 2026
REMEDIATION ORDER
2 UPON the Applicant’s application for a remediation order under section 123 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (the “Act”) in respect of the property known as 1- 31 Oyster Bay Apartments, Sterte, Poole [POSTCODE] (“the Property”)
AND UPON the Respondent consenting to a remediation order being made on the terms set out below (the “Remediation Order”)
AND UPON the Respondent admitting that the defects (the “Relevant Defects”) set out in the schedule hereto (the “Schedule”) are relevant defects within the meaning of the Act
AND UPON the Tribunal making the Remediation Order on the terms agreed between the parties
AND UPON the following expert evidence having been provided to the parties in these proceedings:
(1) report of [NAME] dated 24 November 2025 (2) report of [NAME] dated 12 February 2026 (3) report of [NAME] [NAME] dated 13 February 2026 (4) joint statement of Mr [NAME] and Mr [NAME] dated 13 March 2026
THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:
1. The Respondent shall remedy the Relevant Defects by the time specified in paragraph 3 below.
2. The Respondent shall do so in accordance with the works (the “Agreed Works”) contained in the Schedule
or
such other means (the “Alternative Works”) as shall effectively ensure the remediation of the Relevant Defects to the Property.
3. The Respondent shall complete the Agreed Works and/or any Alternative Works (collectively the “Works”) by no later than 14th August 2030.
4. The Respondent shall do so in compliance with the Building Regulations applicable at the time the Works are undertaken so that the Relevant Defects are remedied. The Respondent shall obtain a post- Works Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW) pursuant to PAS 9980:2022.
5. The parties have permission to apply in relation to paragraphs 1 and 3 and the Schedule. In particular, the Respondent has permission to apply to extend the time for compliance with this Order.
3 6. Any application must:
i) be made using the Tribunal’s Form “Order 1”; ii) be supported by detailed evidence explaining the reason for the application and a proposed draft order setting out the variation sought; iii) be served on the lessees of the residential apartments in the Building and iv) include a realistic time estimate for the application to be heard.
7. The parties may rely on relevant expert evidence in support of the application.
8. The Respondent must notify the Tribunal and the Applicant, that it considers it has complied with this Order, within one month of the certified date of practical completion of the Works.
Pursuant to section 123(7) of the Building Safety Act 2022, this Order is enforceable with the permission of the County Court in the same way as an order of that court.
4 SCHEDULE
- 1-31 Oyster Bay Apartments, Sterte, Poole [POSTCODE]
Relevant Defect
Agreed Works
External wall defects
Wall Type 1 contains combustible thermal insulation.
Remove and replace with panels having insulation of Class A2, s1-d0 or better. Wall Types 2 and 3 contain combustible thermal insulation.
Remove and replace with thermal insulation of Class A2-s1, d0 or better. Wall Type 1 cladding panels installed with fixed to timber battens.
Remove and replace with non-combustible alternative. Wall Type 1 panels penetrated by services and balcony/balustrade fixings with no cavity barriers provided.
Where penetrations are open to the wall cavities, install suitable cavity barriers. In those locations where the services, fittings etc are not steel (at least 0.5mm thick) and penetration communicates with the wall cavity. Cavity barriers omitted from around windows and other openings services penetrations in Wall Type 2.
Install suitable cavity barriers in all locations specified in current edition of Approved Document B. No proprietary cavity barriers in Wall Type 1 and steel sections that could fulfil the role have unsealed perforations and penetrations.
Install proprietary cavity barriers in relevant locations or correctly and adequately fire stop the perforations and penetrations in the existing steel channels. Omitted or inadequate fire compartment and/or fire resisting walls and valleys of trapezoidal roof / floor Install suitable fire stopping in the valleys of the trapezoidal decks where they run perpendicular to the fire separating walls.
5 decking.
Internal defects
Inadequately installed mineral fibre as fire stopping where services penetrate fire separating walls within flats.
Install suitable fire stopping wherever fire separating walls are penetrated by services etc. Fire compartment wall between services cupboard (top floor) and adjacent flat incomplete.
Repair gap between plasterboard lining to fire compartment wall. Steel roof/floor beams passing through fire compartment walls not adequately fire stopped.
Remove inadequate fire stopping and install suitable fire stopping product/method. Fire stopping missing from plastic back boxes of electrical sockets in fire separating walls.
Install adequate fire stopping to sockets, such as “putty pads” or similar. Soil vent pipe in bathroom of flats on topmost floor of Property inadequately fire stopped.
Install suitable and adequate fire stopping. Combustible timber decking on balconies.
Remove and replace with suitable non-combustible alternative. Inadequate stair core compartmentation.
Remove inadequate fire stopping and install suitable fire stopping product/method. Inadequate fire compartmentation.
Commission a competent person to carry out an intrusive survey of the Property and then remedy all relevant defects identified in the survey.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Service Charges Owed by Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Tenant Liable for Service Charges and Lease Breac…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Service Charge Liability for Carport Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Wins Fire Alarm Repair Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Tenant's Service Charges and Lease Violations
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Emergency Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Carpet Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal rules on leaseholder's breach of repair and nuisance ob…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal rules against landlord's administration charge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules in favour of RTM Company at Fourways House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repair Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Unconditional Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord agreed to a remediation order being made on the terms set out.
- The landlord admitted that the defects listed in the schedule are relevant defects.
- The Tribunal made the remediation order based on the terms agreed between the parties.
- The landlord must remove and replace combustible thermal insulation in Wall Type 1 with Class A2, s1-d0 or better.
- The landlord must install suitable cavity barriers where penetrations are open to the wall cavities.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided that the landlord must remedy building safety defects in Oyster Bay Apartments.
Who was involved?
The claimant, a local council, and the respondent, Sovereign Network Group.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal issued an order based on admitted defects and agreed terms between parties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Building Safety Act 2022 s.123 was used to issue the remediation order.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The admission of relevant defects by the respondent and agreement on remediation terms.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was in favour of the claimant, as the landlord agreed to remedy the issues.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing building safety defects can seek remediation through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Expert reports and joint statements on building defects were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only if there are specific grounds for appeal under the tribunal rules.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for legal advice and representation.
