Market Rent Determination for Tenancy Disputes
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property, considering factors like the tenant's responsibility for repairs and the state of the property. The final rent set was £1,330 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the specific conditions and obligations of their tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent, considering the terms of the tenancy and disregarding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property taking into account various factors such as the tenant's repair obligations and the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property, adjusting the rent based on the tenant's repair obligations and the property's condition, resulting in a rent of £1,330 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AT/MNR/2024/0097
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 87 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT]. [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 89 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,330 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 March 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 16 November 1990
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant responsible for internal repairs and redecoration.
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
9. Description of premises A mid -terraced house comprising a through lounge, kitchen, three-bedrooms, bathroom and outside WC.
Chairman A. [NAME] of Decision 17/01/2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AT/MNR/2024/0097
Property : 87 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord : Ms [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 26th February 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 17th January 2025
Amended on 21st January 2025
_______________________________________________
AMENDED DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,330 per calendar month with effect from 1st March 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
We exercise our powers under Rule 50 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 to correct the clerical mistake at paragraph 1 (one) of our Decision dated 17/01/2025. Our amendments are made in bold red type. We have corrected our original Decision because of an accidental slip.
Background
1. On 22 January 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,500 in place of the existing rent of £1,025 per calendar month to take effect from 01 August 2024 01 March 2024. There seemed to be disagreement over the existing rent figure as the Landlord’s notice of increase states the existing rent to be £1,025 on 22 January 2024. Whereas the Tenant states the rent to be £1,015 in the tribunal application form dated 16 February 2024.
2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s application was received by the Tribunal on 26 February 2024.
3. Directions were issued on 18 October 2024 by the Tribunal.
4. The parties were invited to submit any relevant information and submissions. The Tenant submitted a reply form and additional evidence to support his case. The Landlord submitted evidence largely focused on previous tribunal cases and the jurisdiction of the tribunal. The Tribunal jurisdiction point was dealt with in a separate decision dated 9 October 2024.
5. Both the Landlord and the Tenant stated that they were content for the rent to be determined on the papers. Accordingly the Tribunal determined the case on the basis of the papers.
Evidence
7. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation
8. Having consideration of the evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider
3 that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,900 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
The Tenant’s repair obligations, furnishings, lack of central heating, condition and damp issues.
9. The valuation is shown below:
per calendar month Market Rent
£1,900
Less Tenant’s internal repairing and decoration obligations Lack of landlord furniture, white goods, floor and window coverings No central heating Damp issues (Approx, 30%)
£570
£1,330
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,330 per calendar month.
Decision
8. The Tribunal determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,330 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,330 to take effect on 1 March 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 17 January 2025
Amended on 21 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Unfurnished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: What Tenants Need to Know
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Comparable Lettings
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,330 per calendar month.
- The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards due to the tenant's responsibility for internal repairs and redecoration.
- The Tribunal reduced the market rent because the landlord did not provide furniture, white goods, or floor and window coverings.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £1,500 was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for a property was set at £1,330 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the tenant's repair obligations and the condition of the property to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the tenant's responsibilities for repairs were crucial arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also seek a fair adjustment of rent based on their specific circumstances.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and evidence regarding the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if the party disagrees with the outcome.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice and representation in such cases.
