VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £1675 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The monthly rent was fixed at £1675.00, effective from 7 June 2023. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which was applied in this case to set the rent at £1675 per month.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1675, effective from June 7, 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 7 June 2023, setting the monthly rent at £1675.00 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BJ/MNR/2023/0082

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 55 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 07 June 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 16 June 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord liable but tenant must take reasonable care of property

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Beds in each bedroom, wardrobe, large sofa, dining table/chairs, kitchen cutlery/dishes

8. Description of premises Purpose built second floor flat comprising 2 bedrooms, kitchen, living room, bathroom, WC. Central heating and double glazing.

Chairman Mr [NAME] of Decision 18 June 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant was entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tribunal determined the new rent to be £1675.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent determination takes effect from 07 June 2023.
  • The landlord is liable for repairs, but the tenant must take reasonable care of the property.
  • The landlord provided furniture including beds, a wardrobe, a large sofa, and kitchen items.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1675.00, effective from June 7, 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £1675 per month, effective from June 7, 2023, based on the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, the rent for an assured periodic tenancy can be determined using the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.