Market Rent Set at £1,200 Per Month by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for a a person in Slough at £1,200 per month, effective from April 7th, 2024. The decision took into account the condition and maintenance of the a person.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the relevant tenancy legislation, a landlord must maintain the property regardless of the rent paid by the tenant.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.
This section implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, installations for the supply of water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, and installations for space heating and heating water.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a market rent lower than the landlord's proposed increase due to disrepair and lack of maintenance, despite the tenant's obligations.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per calendar month effective from 7 April 2024, considering the condition and maintenance of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case reference : CAM/00MD/MNR/2024/0072 HMCTS code : V:[NAME] : 104 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) : [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT] Respondent (Landlord) : [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of application : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 5 August 2024
DECISION
The Hearing was held by means of CVP video conferencing. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.
2 Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per calendar month effective from 7 April 2024.
Reasons Background
1. On 9 February 2024 the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £1,050 per calendar month (pcm) to £1,400 with effect from 7 April 2024.
2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.
3. The Tenant made an application dated 1 April 2024 to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988.
4. The Tribunal issued directions on 12 April 2024, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the tribunal to consider.
The [NAME]
5. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] on 3 June 2023 accompanied by the Tenant.
6. The Landlord did not attend the inspection.
7. The [NAME] comprises a ground floor flat within a purpose-built apartment block constructed circa 2000. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms. There is gated communal car parking but limited outside garden space.
8. There is electric panel heating throughout the [NAME] supplemented by two storage heaters and the [NAME] is fitted commensurate with its age. The [NAME] also benefits from double glazing. The Tenancy 9. The Tenant occupied the [NAME] by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that commenced 7 September 2012 and expired on 6 March 2013.
10. The initial rent under this Tenancy was £850 pcm.
11. The [NAME] is defined as: “The dwellinghouse known as [ADDRESS], Langley, Berks.”
3 12. The Tenant’s repair obligations are set out at clause 3.5 which states: “To keep the interior of the [NAME] and the Contents in good and clean condition and complete repair (reasonable wear and tear excepted) and to keep the [NAME] at all times well and sufficiently aired and warmed during the tenancy to avoid mould and condensation.” 13. The Landlord covenants at clause 6 to: “…carry out any repairing obligations as required by section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.” 14. In the absence of a new Tenancy being entered into, an Assured Periodic Tenancy pursuant to Section 5 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) has arisen such that Sections 13 and 14 of the Act now apply. The Law 15. Section 5 (3) of the Act provides that the periodic tenancy arising on expiry of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy is one: “(a) taking effect in possession immediately on the coming to an end of the fixed term tenancy; (b) deemed to have been granted by the [NAME] under the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end to the [NAME] under that tenancy; (c) under which the premises which are let are the same dwelling- house as was let under the fixed term tenancy; (d) under which the periods of the tenancy are the same as those for which rent was last payable under the fixed term tenancy; and (e) under which, subject to the following provisions of this Part of this Act, the other terms are the same as those of the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end, except that any term which makes provision for determination by the landlord or the tenant shall not have effect while the tenancy remains an assured tenancy” 16. Section 14 of the 1988 Act provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
4 c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 17. Section 14 (2) of the 1988 Act requires the Tribunal to disregard: a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation; c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 18. Examples of a tenant’s failure to comply with the terms of the lease may include, for example, a lack of redecoration.
19. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for making use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 20. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.” Representations – The Tenant 21. The Tenant provided the Tribunal with a five-page summary of 54 issues concerning outstanding matters including disrepair.
5 22. In addition, the Tribunal was provided with copies of an Improvement Notice dated 24 November 2023 and a Notice of Variation to that Notice dated 5 December 2023.
23. No evidence was provided in respect of rental values.
24. The Tenant attended the Hearing and further explained the points raised in their written representations. Representations – The Landlord 25. The Landlord advised as follows: “I feel strongly that this [i.e., the Tenant’s] response doesn’t paint a very accurate picture of the [NAME] that he lives in. I have attached pictures from the last visit made to record some of the issues that had been raised at the time. The tenant and his family have lived happily in this apartment for nearly 12 years. They were made aware a couple of years ago that the landlord wished to sell the [NAME] and so far three section 21 notices requiring possession have been served since 2022. It is my belief that the tenant contacts the council each time to request an improvement notice be served in order to invalidate the possession request… …He constantly requests that improvements are made but without increasing the rent the landlord is unable to make them.” 26. The Landlord also provided a summary of rents at [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS]. Determination 27. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. The current rent, and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.
28. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.
29. However, as set out above, the Tribunal is required to have regard to the obligations of the Landlord and Tenant in respect of the repair, maintenance and upkeep of the [NAME].
30. The Tenants’ repair obligations are set out at clause 3.5 of the Lease which, as previously mentioned, requires the Tenant to:
6 “…keep the interior of the [NAME] and the Contents in good and clean condition and complete repair (reasonable wear and tear excepted) and to keep the [NAME] at all times well and sufficiently aired and warmed during the tenancy to avoid mould caused by condensation.” 31. As set out above, section 14 (2) (c) of the 1988 Act requires the Tribunal to disregard any failure by the Tenant to comply with their lease obligations. However, the Tribunal is to have regard to matters that are not a result of the Tenants’ failure to comply.
32. In this regard, disrepair that comprises wear and tear is specifically excluded from the Tenant’s obligations The Tribunal therefore assumes that the [NAME] has been kept in repair but takes account of “reasonable wear and tear” the rectification of which would fall to the Landlord rather than the Tenant.
33. It is therefore necessary to distinguish between items of disrepair that have arisen through the Tenant failing to comply with the Lease and matters that fall to the Landlord.
34. It is clear that the [NAME] requires significant work that does not fall to the Tenant pursuant to the Lease provisions. This work has therefore been taken into account by the Tribunal in assessing the rent.
35. These are largely the same issues that the Tribunal has identified previously but it is apparent that there has been inaction on the part of the Landlord and the [NAME] has continued to deteriorate. Such work that has been carried out is of poor quality, short term and cosmetic.
36. In this regard, the Tribunal is concerned to note that the Landlord, despite engaging the services of [NAME], is under the misapprehension that compliance with his obligations to the Tenant is contingent upon the Tenant paying an increased rent.
37. For clarity, the Landlord is required to comply with their obligations irrespective as the level of rent payable and it is irrelevant whether or not the Landlord considers that the rent payable is sufficient to fund their statutory and contractual obligations. A lack of funding is not a defence that can be relied upon by the Landlord to excuse inaction.
38. Whilst the Tribunal has noted the pictures provided by the Tenant it had the opportunity to inspect the [NAME] and has based its deliberations on what was observed during that inspection. In this regard, it is clear that the [NAME] falls well below market expectations of repair and decoration. This disrepair and lack of decoration directly impacts upon the rent that an incoming tenant would be prepared to offer.
39. In this regard, if the [NAME] was in full repair and decoration throughout, the Landlord’s expectation of attracting a rent in the region of £1,400 per month, based on the evidence provided by the Landlord, would not be unreasonable. However, in the absence of any evidence to
7 suggest that the properties referred to by the Landlord are in a similar state of disrepair and decoration as the [NAME], a discount is warranted.
40. The Tribunal therefore determines the market rental of the [NAME] to be £1,200 pcm. The rent payable may not, therefore, exceed this figure. However, this does not prevent the Landlord from charging a lower figure.
41. This rent is to be effective from 7 April 2024.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 5 August 2024
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,300 pcm
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,950 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Shoeburyness Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,400 Per Month for Semi-Detached House in Wokingham
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,600 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Property in Norwich
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property required significant work not falling to the tenant, which the Tribunal considered when assessing the rent.
- The property's disrepair and lack of decoration directly impacted the rent an incoming tenant would offer.
- The landlord's inaction led to the property's continued deterioration, with only poor quality, short-term, and cosmetic work being carried out.
- The Tribunal based its decision on its own inspection of the property, noting it fell below market expectations for repair and decoration.
- The landlord's obligation to comply with repairs is not dependent on the tenant paying an increased rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's belief that the tenant's council contact was to invalidate possession requests was not accepted as a factor in rent determination.
- The landlord's argument that they could not make improvements without increasing the rent was rejected.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for a property was set at £1,200 per month, effective from April 7th, 2024.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the market rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition and maintenance of the property, setting the rent at £1,200 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and maintenance of the property were crucial arguments in the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure the property is well-maintained to secure a fair market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and details of rental values for similar properties were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving market rent determinations.
