VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Case

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent from £1,500 to £1,325 per month, considering the property's condition and comparable rents in the Battersea area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A willing landlord under an assured tenancy must consider the property's condition and comparable rents when setting a market rent.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent adjustment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. When making a determination, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for renting the property in the open market, taking into account the property's condition and comparable rents.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. It also includes the installations for water, gas, electricity, sanitation, space heating, and heating water. However, the landlord is not required to carry out repairs unless they affect the tenant's enjoyment of the dwelling house or common parts.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to account for the property's condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,500 to £1,325 per month, taking into account the property's condition and comparable rents in the Battersea area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. FR/LON/00BJ/MNR/2024/0696

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 11 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1325 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 November 2024

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 July 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A purpose built first floor flat forming part of a three storey block with underground allocated parking space. Accommodation comprises: one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom, WC and small balcony.

[NAME] of Decision 28 January 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BJ/MNR/2024/0696

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Tenants Objection : 3 November 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Reasons : 28 January 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,325 per calendar month with effect from 22 November 2024. ___________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS

Background

1. On the 18 September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,500 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,061 per month to take effect from 22 November 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement which commenced on the 22 July 2017 for a period of 12 months.

2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. This Notice was dated 3 November 2024.

Inspection

3. An inspection of the property was undertaken by the Tribunal on the 28 January 2025. The Tribunal arrived at the property at around 10.30 in the presence of the tenant.

Evidence

4. Directions were prepared by the Tribunal on the 6 December 2024. The Landlord and the Tenant provided the Tribunal with completed Reply Forms and comprehensive submissions which included photographs and details of comparable evidence from the Landlord. The property has been the subject of Local Authority intervention in the form of a Preliminary Improvement Notice dated 4 April 2024 and a Hazard Awareness Notice dated 4 November 2024.

5. The property is a purpose built first floor flat forming part of a three storey block assumed to have been built around 1990. The property has an allocated parking space and the accommodation comprises: one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom/WC and small balcony. Heating is provided by dated electric storage heaters and the windows are double glazed. The Landlord provided floor coverings, curtains and white goods at the commencement of the tenancy.

The Law 6. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure

3 to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, partial exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration and rainwater fittings.

Determination and Valuation

7. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord which provides “snapshot ”details of 2 flats to rent in the same block at £1,500 per month, and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Battersea area. The Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £1,5o0 per month.

8. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the damp and mould to the walls caused by a previous water leak, dated kitchen and sanitary fittings and dated electric storage heaters which equates to approximately 13% (£175.00) It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

Decision

9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,325 per calendar month.

10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,325.00 per month to take effect on the 22 November 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 28 January 2025

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

4 By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is significantly poor.
  • Rent adjustments should reflect the property's state of repair.
  • Local market conditions influence the fair market rent.
  • Rent should be set according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • Tenants are entitled to a fair market rent assessment by the Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,500 to £1,325 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the landlord's proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and comparable rents in the Battersea area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and comparable rents.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and comparable rents when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and details of comparable evidence from the landlord were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.