Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They reduced the rent from £980 to £900 per month because the property had window defects, damp issues, and required repairs by the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment if the property is not in good condition and the tenant has repair obligations.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the condition of the property and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property and the tenant's obligations.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property and the tenant's obligations. The rent was reduced from £980 to £900 per month due to window defects, damp issues, and the tenant's repair obligations.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/21UC/MNR/2024/0045
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] [ADDRESS] BN21
Tenant [NAME] & Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 26 February 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 26 September 2020
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord exterior and services; tenant internal repairs
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises First floor 2-bedroom flat with kitchen, living room, bathroom and toilet.
[NAME] of Decision 14 December 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
CHI/21UC/MNR/2024/0045
Property :
[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent: [redacted] :
[NAME] of application :
Referral of Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 26 December 2024
______________________________________________________ _ DECISION
The Tribunal determines a market rent of £900 per calendar month with effect from 26th February 2024
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 8 January 2024 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £980 per month in place of the existing rent of £850 per month to take effect from 26th February 2024.
2. On 18 February 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the tenant and Google Maps. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions including photographs provided by the tenant including a copy of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated 25 September 2020. The Agreement contains an obligation by the tenant to keep the interior in good repair and condition, excluding items for which the landlord is liable. The landlord did not respond to the appeal. Determination and Valuation 5. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the tenant and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenable condition would be in the region of £1,200 per month.
6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord, and the property to be in good condition.
7. In this case the property is not let in such condition as the windows are in poor condition and there is no double glazing. Further, there is significant damp penetration and other wants of repair. The Tribunal also considered that the tenants repairing obligation should result in a rent adjustment.
Accordingly, the Tribunal adjusted the open market rent to reflect these matters.
8. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,200 Less deductions for:- Window defects/ absence of double glazing ) Damp/wants of repair )
3 Tenants repairing obligation ) 25% £300
____ MARKET RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£900 9. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy would be £900 per month. 10. The Tribunal determined that this rent should commence on 26 February 2024 being the date specified in the landlord’s notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Eastbourne Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Neglect
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Property's Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Propert…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant has contributed to the property's maintenance and improvements.
- The property is in a state of disrepair.
- The rent is adjusted based on the property's condition and market comparables under the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for specific conditions of the property.
- A tenant can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £980 to £900 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and the tenant's repair obligations.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the tenant's obligations.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to negotiate a lower rent if the property is not in good condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and a copy of the tenancy agreement were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
