First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Considering Tenant Improvements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent from £925 to £780 per month after considering the tenant's contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment when they have contributed to the property's maintenance and improvements.
📖 What the law says
This rule allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The tribunal considers the terms of the existing tenancy and disregards certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in property value due to improvements made by the tenant, and decreases in property value due to the tenant's non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the tenant's contributions and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent from £925 to £780 per month, considering the tenant's contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0513
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988, Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Judge Gethin
Landlord [NAME] c/o [RESPONDENT], 185A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £780.00 Per Calendar Month (To exclude Water Rates and Council Tax but to include any amounts in paragraphs 3 and 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 September 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 August 1993
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. Tenant responsible for internal decorations only.
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
8. Description of premises Basement/Garden one bedroom flat in a converted four storey Victorian house of traditional brick construction with pitched tiled roof. The accommodation comprises one reception room, kitchen with utility area, one bedroom and one bathroom/WC. Outside – communal gardens.
[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 4 March 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0513 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] [NAME] :
None
Respondent Landlord : Ms [COUNSEL] : Mr [COUNSEL] [RESPONDENT] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent - sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Judge D Gethin Date of Application : 31 July 2024 Date of Decision :
4 March 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £780 (Seven Hundred and Eighty Pounds) Per Calendar Month with effect from 1 September 2024.
HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0513 2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 31 July 2024 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £925 per month in place of the existing rent of £740 per month (‘’Which takes into account Tribunal adjustments of £135 per month’’) to take effect from 1 September 2024.
2. On 29 August 2024 under Section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. Pursuant to the Tribunal’s Directions dated 8 January 2025, the Landlord’s Agent (Mr [RESPONDENT]) submitted his [NAME] on 21 January 2025; the same was copied to the Tenant the same day.
5. Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] includes: an outline description of the property (a ground floor, one-bedroom flat); an Energy performance certificate (EPC), Energy rating ‘D’ – date of assessment 5 December 2019; and a ‘Mid Tenancy Property Inspection’ report, dated 9 August 2024.
6. Mr [RESPONDENT] says central heating is provided by the landlord and there are communal gardens. With respect to improvements, a new boiler was installed in 2017; for which a copy Certificate of Registration, dated 5 December 2017, is provided. As to disrepair and defects, during 2024 repairs were carried out to rectify damp penetration to the reception room, for which copy invoices are provided. Mr [RESPONDENT] goes on to say ‘’The landlord has made no recent upgrades to the bathroom and kitchen fittings.’’ 7. Mr [NAME] assesses the rental value of Flat 4 at £925 per calendar month and goes on to say ‘’This figure is before taking into account any Tribunal abatements, which last year amounted to £135 per month.’’ 8. There are six (6) comparable lettings’ properties included in Mr [NAME] [NAME] which he has used to reach his opinion of the market rent of £925 per calendar month, before taking into account any abatements.
9. The range of rental values of the six, one-bedroom flats, all of which are in the vicinity is from £900 per calendar month to £1,025 per calendar month.
10. The Tenant has not given a [NAME], but informs in his Application to the Tribunal, as follows: (1) the property is described as a basement, one- bedroom flat; whereas there is no written tenancy agreement, it is stated to have
HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0513 3 commenced on 1 August 1993; neither white goods, nor furniture are provided and ‘’…all fixtures and fittings including caprpets [sic], linoleum, curtains etc provided and paid for by the tennant [sic]’’.
11. On improvements, Mr [NAME] says he fitted the kitchen, has carried out works to the kitchen floor and has installed additional radiators. Determination and Valuation 12. At paragraph 2 of the Landlord’s Notice proposing a new rent it says ‘The landlord is proposing a new rent of £925.00 per month, in place of the existing one of £740.00 per month (WHICH TAKES INTO ACCOUNT TRIBUNAL ADJUSTMENTS OF £135.00 PER MONTH).
Accordingly, the Tribunal understands the £925 per month proposed is Mr [NAME] assessment of the market rent of the property in good tenantable condition, before any adjustment for this assured tenancy is made; as opposed to the rent he proposes the Tenant is to pay.
13. Having considered what Mr [APPELLANT] says in his Application to the Tribunal and the evidence of Mr [NAME] in his [NAME] and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the market rent for the property in good tenantable condition is £950 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.
14. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings, modern kitchen and bathroom equipment, all to be provided by the Landlord.
15. Mr [RESPONDENT] has informed the Tribunal of various works the Landlord has carried out. The Tribunal has determined these works are those the Landlord is responsible for in any event.
16. In his Application, Mr [NAME] has given details of various works he has carried out, which are outlined at paragraphs 10 and 11 above. The Tenant is responsible for internal decorations only.
Accordingly, some adjustments to the market rent are necessary.
17. The Tribunal’s valuation is shown below: Market rent in good condition (£ PCM)
£950 Less deductions (£ PCM) for: Tenant’s provision of white goods
£30 Tenant’s responsibility for internal decorations £25 Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains
£40 Dated kitchen, bathroom and general repair £75 £170
HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0513 4 Market rent (per calendar month)
£780
18. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £780 (Seven Hundred and Eighty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.
19. The Tenant has made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause him undue hardship.
20.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directs that the new rent of £780 Per Calendar Month should take effect from 1 September 2024. This being the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice proposing a new rent.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Eastbourne Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Neglect
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Propert…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant has made contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements.
- The rent adjustment takes into account the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant has referred the landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal.
- The rent is adjusted based on the property's condition and the absence of certain amenities.
- The rent is determined by considering what a willing landlord would charge in the open market.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £925 to £780 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent based on the tenant's contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements mattered most.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a rent adjustment if they have contributed to the property's maintenance and improvements.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the tenant's contributions to the property's maintenance and improvements mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
