First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £880 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £900 because the tenant had provided some white goods.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the condition of the property and any tenant-provided amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. The tribunal will then decide a fair market rent for the property, considering the conditions of the tenancy and the property itself. The decision will be based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair market rent of £880 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting the initial proposed rent of £900 due to the tenant providing some white goods.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UN/MNR/2024/0519
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Originally Mrs [RESPONDENT], now [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME], [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] [COMPANY], 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 880.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 September 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 November 2015
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises 4th floor 2-bedroom flat.
[NAME] of Decision 11 November 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/29UN/MNR/2024/0519 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Miss [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : Originally Mrs [RESPONDENT], now [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME], [RESPONDENT]. Representative : [COUNSEL] [COMPANY] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] R [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] I [NAME] of Application : 11th September 2024 Date of Decision :
11th November 2024
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £880 per calendar month with effect from 20th September 2024.
HAV/29UN/MNR/2024/0519
2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 16th August 2024 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £900 per month in place of the existing rent of £475 per month to take effect from 20th September 2024.
2. On 11th September 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Parties. Determination and Valuation 5. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenable condition would be £900 per calendar month.
6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
7. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets/curtains and fittings all supplied so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In particular the Tribunal has made the adjustments for Tenant’s provision of some white goods.
8. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £900 Less deductions for:- Tenants provision of some white goods
£20
____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£880
9. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £880 per month.
HAV/29UN/MNR/2024/0519
3 10. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. 11. Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £880 per month should take effect from 20th September 2024 this being the date specified in the notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Open Market Value Adjusted
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
- The rent should be adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The rent should reflect comparable evidence and local rental values.
- Any tenant-provided amenities should be considered in determining the fair market rent.
- The Tribunal must base its decision on the open market value, adjusted for the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a fair market rent of £880 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property, adjusting the rent due to the tenant providing some white goods.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the fact that the tenant provided some white goods.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent adjusted if they provide certain amenities.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and comparable evidence were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
