VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £1,275 per month for an assured tenancy after considering comparable evidence and minor repairs needed in the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the same terms and conditions as the original tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent based on comparable evidence and minor repairs needed.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,275 per month for an assured tenancy, considering comparable evidence and minor repairs needed in the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/24UB/MNR/2024/0624

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 Cherry Orchard Whitchurch Hampshire [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 23-25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1275.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 25 November 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 25 February 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises Modern 2-bedroom terraced house.

[NAME] of Decision 19 December 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/24UB/MNR/2024/0624 Property : 7 Cherry Orchard Whitchurch Hampshire [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : [NAME] [COUNSEL] and [NAME] [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME] : [NAME] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Application : 27th October 2024 Date of Decision :

19th December 2024

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,275 per calendar month with effect from 25th November 2024.

HAV/24UB/MNR/2024/0624 2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 17th October 2024 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,350 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,100 per month to take effect from 25th November 2024.

2. On 27th October 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord’s Agent. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenable condition would be £1,300 per calendar month.

6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.

7. In this case the property is not let in such tenable condition and the Tribunal decided that a reduction of £25 per month should be made to reflect the minor wants of repair detailed in the Tenants application.

8. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,275 per month.

9. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,275 per month should take effect from 25th November 2024 this being the date specified in the notice. APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should

HAV/24UB/MNR/2024/0624 3 first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,300 per month for the property in good condition.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent by £25 per month due to minor repair issues mentioned by the tenants.
  • The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice because the tenant did not claim hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £1,275 per month for an assured tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and minor repairs needed in the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about comparable evidence and minor repairs was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent adjustment based on property condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and documentation about the property's condition mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.