VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £235 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and current market value.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationmarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the condition of the property and the open market conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the state of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £235 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market value.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 N [NAME] First-tier Tribunal – Property ChamberFile Ref No. GB/LON/00AN/MNR/2024/0244 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

N O’Brien Tribunal Judge K Ridgeway Valuer Member

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 235.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 9 December 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 11/12/2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per Tenancy

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises This is a converted lower ground floor flat with garden and own entrance, in a converted Victorian terraced house. Accommodation is comprised of Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom.

MR22 Chairman N O’Brien Date of Decision 9 October 2024

Case Reference : LON/00AN/MNR/2024/0244

Property : 28A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 3 April 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Judge N O’Brien, Mr K Ridgeway MRICS

Date of Summary Reasons

: 9 October 2024

_______________________________________________ DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £235 per calendar week with effect from 5 August 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

1. On 20 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £215.26 per week in place of the existing rent of £119.87 per week to take effect from Monday 1 April 2024.

2. On 3 April 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having considered our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition to be in the region of £430 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation the condition of the premises and the lack of white goods and flooring.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£430 per week

Less

Unmodernised bathroom ) Partial double glazing

)

approx. 45 % Damp and mould

)

No flooring or carpets provided )

No white goods

)

(£195) £235

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £235 per week.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £235 per week.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £235 to take effect on the date of this decision. The tenant has stated that her wages have not kept pace with inflation and the increased cost would impact her significantly. The Tribunal was satisfied that a

starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: N O’Brien

Date: 9 October 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the condition of the property.
  • The rent takes into account the contents and condition of the property.
  • The rent is adjusted considering local rental values.
  • The rent adjustment includes the tenant's provision of certain items.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £235 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition and market value was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect their rent to be adjusted based on the property's condition and market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a request for full reasons and details on how to appeal must be made within a month.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.