VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £450 per month, excluding some costs. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might charge in the open market for a similar property. The application must meet certain conditions, such as not being made if the rent is already set by a previous decision or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £450 excluding certain costs.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/41UG/MNR/2024/0195

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] Stoke on Trent [POSTCODE]

[NAME] T. [RESPONDENT] FRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [NAME]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £450.00 Per Four weeks (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 September 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 July 2014

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises End Terraced House with 2 [NAME] of Decision 12 December 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's right to have their rent assessed under the specified act.
  • Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 is invoked successfully by tenants seeking rent determination.
  • Rent determination requests by tenants are consistently allowed under Section 14.
  • The Housing Act 1988 provides a clear entitlement for tenants to have their rent set.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £450 per month.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for determining rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the relevant provisions of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence likely included details about the property and the tenancy agreement.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.