VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1500 per month, which includes the cost of furniture provided by the landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay under their assured tenancy, except if the rent was previously determined by the tribunal or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1500 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including furniture provided by the landlord.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AM/MNR/2024/0282

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge M [NAME] Ma MRICS

Landlord [NAME] C/ Sant Vicenc 19, 2:2, Barcelona, Spain, 08001

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1500 Per calendar (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 September 2024

3. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 Dec 2020

4.Length of the term or rental period Monthly

5. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 Housing Act 1985

6. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord As per application : wardrobe, clothes drawers, table, sofa, kitchen whites, 2 high chairs, 3 table chairs, bathroom cabinet.

7. Description of premises Not inspected but a one bedro0m self contained flat

Chairman Judge Daley Date of Decision 13 September 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The Tribunal determined the rent for the premises to be £1500 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent determination will take effect from 13 September 2024.
  • The tenancy commenced on 1 December 2020 and has a monthly rental period.
  • The landlord provides specific furniture including a wardrobe, sofa, and kitchen appliances.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £1500 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation of rent under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for determining their rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.