VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy by considering market conditions and comparable evidence. The rent was set at £750 per calendar month.

⚖️ Legal holding

The Tribunal must determine the rent at which a willing landlord could reasonably expect to let the property on the open market.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent has already been determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. When the tribunal makes a decision, they must determine the rent at which a willing landlord would reasonably expect to let the property on the open market. The tribunal considers a periodic tenancy with the same periods as the original tenancy, starting at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and comparable evidence.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and comparable evidence, setting the rent at £750 per calendar month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0040

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal member was: 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

V Ward BSc Hons FRICS

Landlord Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £750.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 April 2023

3. The amount included for services is - not applicable

Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included – not applicable.

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 7 January 2022 6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises End terraced house offering 3 bedrooms.

Chairman V Ward BSc Hons FRICS Date of Decision 20 November 2023

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference : BIR/41UG/MNR/2023/0027

Property : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT] of Application : An application under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 referring a notice proposing a new rent under an Assured Periodic Tenancy to the Tribunal. Tribunal Member : V Ward BSc Hons FRICS – Regional Surveyor Date of Decision : 20 November 2023 Date of Statement : 30 November 2023 of Reasons

STATEMENT OF REASONS

FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Page 2 of 4

BACKGROUND

1. The Notice of Rent Increase served by the Landlord dated 6 February 2023 sought to increase the rental of the Property from £715.00 per calendar month to £755.00 with effect from 7 April 2023. The Tenant’s application was received on 17 February 2023.

2. The tenancy commenced on 7 January 2022.

The Property

3. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the Property on 11 October 2023. A Representative of the Tenant provided access. The Landlord did not attend.

4. The end terraced Property is situated fronting onto [ADDRESS], a small estate of similar properties approximately 1.3 miles from the centre of Alsager. The plot upon which the Property stands is effectively a double width.

5. Unusually, the Property offers the dormitory accommodation at ground floor level with living areas at first floor level.

The accommodation offered is as follows:

GF: Three bedrooms and bathroom with full suite including bath. FF: Lounge and kitchen. Outside: Loose surfaced car standing to the front elevation, gardens front and rear.

The Property benefits from gas fired heating and secondary double glazing.

The Landlord provided the carpets and some white goods. The Tenant provided the curtains.

The Hearing

6. An oral hearing was held by video platform on 22 November 2023. The Tenant took part in the hearing, but the Landlord did not participate.

The Submissions of the Parties

7. The submissions of the parties both in writing and during the hearing can be summarised as follows.

Page 3 of 4

The Tenant

8. The principal issue raised by the Tenant related to the front and rear doors which had both been problematic with the former still not functioning correctly.

The Landlord

9. The Landlord’s provided details of the letting of the adjoining property – [ADDRESS] – which had recently been let for £750.00 per calendar month. The Landlord noted that the property was of similar size to the subject but was mid terraced and did not enjoy the double width plot.

THE LAW

10. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, the Tribunal must determine the rent at which it considers that the subject Property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

11. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), must ignore the effect on the rental value of the Property of any relevant tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) 0f the Act.

VALUATION

12. The Tribunal had regard to the evidence and submissions of the parties, the relevant law and their own knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal but not any special or secret knowledge.

13. Initially, the Tribunal’s determination considers what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property if it were let today in a condition usual for such lettings. It did this by using its own general knowledge of the market rent levels in the area and considered the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord. The information available to the Tribunal in respect of the comparable property was that it had been fully redecorated and offered with new flooring. In the opinion of the Tribunal these factors would offset the benefit of the double plot relating to the subject Property. Taking these factors into account, the Tribunal concluded that the likely market rental would be approximately £750.00 per calendar month.

14. The rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 14 is, therefore, £750.00 with effect from 7 April 2023.

Page 4 of 4

Appeal

15. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

V WARD BSc (Hons) FRICS

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal must consider the rent a willing landlord would accept for letting the property on the open market.
  • Tenants are entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.
  • Tribunals must take into account the condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant.
  • Rent increases causing undue hardship can result in a later start date for the increase.
  • The right to a rent determination applies to assured periodic tenancies.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The Tribunal dismissed the case where the only criterion was the reasonable expectation of a willing landlord without additional context or entitlements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £750 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on market conditions and comparable evidence provided by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence provided by the landlord.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider market conditions and comparable evidence when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence from a similar property mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.