VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Increase Start Date to Reduce Tenant Hardship

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a rent increase and decided to adjust the start date to help the tenant avoid financial hardship.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a later start date for a rent increase if it causes undue hardship.

Topics

rent increasesundue hardship

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal can adjust the rent and the start date of the new rent to reflect what a willing landlord might expect in the open market. This includes considering the terms of the tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal reviewed the rent increase and adjusted the start date to reduce hardship for the tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a rent increase and adjusted the start date to alleviate undue hardship for the tenant under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/41UK/MNR/2023/0122

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal member was: 36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £725.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 June 2023

3. The amount included for services is - not applicable

Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included – not applicable.

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 7 December 2019 6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises 2 [NAME] of Decision 14 December 2023

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference : BIR/41UK/MNR/2023/0122

Property : [ADDRESS] Tamworth Tenant : [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : An application under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 referring a notice proposing a new rent under an Assured Periodic Tenancy, to the Tribunal. Tribunal Member : [NAME] Date of Decision : 22 February 2024

_____________________________________________________ DECISION FOLLOWING REVIEW ________________________________________________

FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Page 2 of 3

Introduction

1. The Tenant sought permission to appeal the Decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) dated 14 December 2023 which determined the rent of the Property as £725.00 per calendar month as from 28 June 2023.

2. The Tenant’s request was made by email received by the Tribunal on 20 December 2023 within the requisite 28 days.

Law

3. Applications for permission to appeal are made pursuant to Part 6 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) Property (Chamber) Rules 2013 ('the Rules').

4. In respect of appeals from Tribunal decisions, Rule 53(1) of the Rules provides that on receiving an application for permission to appeal, the Tribunal must first consider, taking into account the over-riding objective in Rule 3, whether to review the decision in accordance with Rule 55 (review of a decision).

5. Rule 55(1) provides that the Tribunal may only undertake a review of a decision - (a) pursuant to rule 53 (review on an application for permission to appeal); and (b) if satisfied that a ground of appeal is likely to be successful.

The Tenant’s Grounds

6. The Tenant’s issue is with the arrears due to the rent increase from the date of increase specified in the Landlord’s Notice of 28 June 2023 to the date of the Tribunal’s decision, which are stated as £480.00, and her inability to pay the same.

7. Usually, the new rent will take effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase but where that date would cause undue hardship to the tenant, then by section 14(7) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date the Tribunal makes its determination i.e. in this case up to 14 December 2023.

8. The Tribunal treated the Tenant’s appeal as a request for the Tribunal to fix a later commencement date for the new rent under section 14(7).

9. It should be noted that there was no challenge to the level of rent specified by the Tribunal which confirmed the rental of £725.00 per calendar month as specified in the Landlord’s Notice.

Page 3 of 3

10. In order for the Tribunal to consider the request further Directions were issued on 29 December 2023 inviting the parties to make further submissions in respect of the claim for hardship.

Submissions of the Parties

11. The Tenant made further submissions to the effect that she was a single mother on universal credit and child benefit, and with the rise in household bills it was unaffordable that she could pay the arrears of £480.00.

12. The Landlord made no submissions in respect of the claim for hardship.

Decision

13. The Tribunal finds that it would have been taken into account the Tenant’s claim for hardship had it been raised in correspondence before the original decision dated 14 December 2023 and reviews the same under Rule 55 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.

14. The Tribunal determines that the rent of £725.00 is payable from 14 December 2023.

Appeal

15. A party seeking permission to appeal this decision must make a written application to the Tribunal for permission to appeal. This application must be received by the Tribunal no later than 28 days after this decision is sent to the parties. Further information is contained within Part 6 of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013 No. 1169).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is determined based on the open market value adjusted for the property's condition.
  • The rent determination takes into account the current market conditions and the property's state.
  • The rent is assessed according to section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant.
  • The rent is determined by the open market value of similar properties in the area.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified as leading to unfavorable outcomes in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the start date of the rent increase to reduce financial hardship for the tenant.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the start date of the rent increase because it would cause undue hardship for the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent increase and its effective date.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the tenant's claim that the rent increase would cause undue hardship.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get the start date of a rent increase adjusted if it causes undue hardship.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the tenant's financial situation and the impact of the rent increase on their ability to pay were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court within a certain timeframe.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.