Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant. The rent was set at £2,500 per month, effective from 29 March 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value of the property, adjusted for the tenant's improvements and responsibilities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and any improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant. The rent was set at £2,500 per month, effective from 29 March 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UD/MNR/2023/0024
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord The National Trust for Places of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 March 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 March 2008
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A Grade II Listed three storey Villa with an attached first floor self contained flat. The accommodation comprises 2 reception rooms, kitchen/breakfast room, utility room, 4 bedrooms, two bathrooms. Extensive mature gardens with river frontage, garage.
[NAME] of Decision 18 April 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CHI/43UD/MNR/2023/0024 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : [COUNSEL] LLP Respondent : [redacted] Interest Representative : None Type of [NAME] : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] [NAME] : Paper determination Date of decision : 18th April 2023
DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition as at 29th March 2023 might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured tenancy is £2,500 per month Background 1. The tenants have lived in the property as assured periodic tenant since 31st March 2008. At that time the Grade II Listed property was in a basic condition. Over the years, it is evident to the Tribunal that the tenant has undertaken works of repair and improvement to the property which included: internal decorations and plaster repairs, redecoration of sash window units, refurbishment of brass shutter handles, carpets, new sanitary fittings, white goods and extensive works to the garden. The majority of the works were carried out with the landlord’s consent with the exception of the bathroom fittings.
2. On 23rd January 2023 the landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £1,700 to £2,500 per month effective from 29th March 2023.
3. By an [NAME] dated 8th February 2023, the tenant referred that notice to the tribunal for a determination of the market rent. The Tribunal issued Directions for the conduct of the matter on 8th March.
4. The Tribunal considered the matter suitable for a determination on the papers and therefore a hearing was not necessary. The parties did not disagree with this arrangement. The Evidence 5. The parties have prepared a very helpful detailed bundle of evidence which extends to 360 pages which includes a background to the case, the [NAME], the directions, comparable evidence, the tenancy agreement, completed rent appeal statement, the “Mumby Report” with floor plans and ordnance survey extract, schedule of proposed works and photographic evidence.
Inspection 6. The Tribunal did not inspect the property and relied on the detailed information provided by the parties and its expert knowledge. The property is a Grade II Listed Villa, being of significant historic
3 importance. There is a self contained attached flat located at first floor level which is being marketed by the landlord at a rental figure of £1500 pcm. The landlord advises this has now been let for £1495pcm. The property is located in extensive gardens with a river frontage. There is also a garage. The property is located on the periphery of the city centre and lies adjacent the Council offices. It is therefore convenient to local amenities.
7. The accommodation is provided over three floors and was variously described in several floor plans. The Tribunal considered there to be 3 rooms on the ground floor plus utilty room, kitchen, lavatory, store room with 5 rooms, two bathrooms on the upper floors. The floor area is confirmed to be 3,346 square feet.
The Law 8.. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent for each flat at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration.
The valuation 9. Having carefully considered all of the evidence the Tribunal considers that the rent that would be achieved in good condition with refurbished kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services, central heating, carpets, curtains, white goods supplied by the landlord would be £4000 per month. The Tribunal did its very best to analyse the generic “[NAME]” comparable evidence provided by the landlord. This is a completely individual property in terms of location and type. Therefore, the Tribunal had to make certain assumptions regarding specification, location, floor area, house type, actual achieved rent value and any market movement compared with the date of valuation.
4 10. That however is the rent that would be achieved if the property was let in good condition with all modern amenities. The Tribunal must disregard any increase in rental value attributable to the tenant’s improvements, unless they are carried out under an obligation to the landlord. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement, which incorporates the usual repair obligations.
11. Based upon the evidence provided to the Tribunal we consider that that the rent should be reduced by £1,500 to reflect the need for internal refurbishment, the tenants internal decorating responsibilities,the existing condition of the exterior (even though a maintenance programme of £90,000 is planned for the future.) terms of the tenancy, attached flat and access arrangements. Our deduction reduces the rent to a figure of £2,500 per month 12. The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from 29th March 2023.
[NAME] 18th April 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
5 If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent and Necessary Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Costs for Right to Manage Propert…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Repairs Without Consultatio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal Ca…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Defective Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation Without Conditions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
- The tenant can challenge a defective notice of rent increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The landlord can receive dispensation from consultation requirements under urgent circumstances.
- Costs incurred by the respondent in acquiring the right to manage a property are considered reasonable and payable.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The claimant cannot acquire the Right to Manage if the procedural requirements are not met.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,500 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for the tenant's improvements and responsibilities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the impact of the tenant's improvements on the property's value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their improvements are documented and considered in rent determinations.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and the tenant's improvements were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
