VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £615, effective from March 24, 2023. This decision follows the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering factors such as the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy. Additionally, certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance are disregarded when determining the rent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 24 March 2023, setting the monthly rent at £615 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/37UD/MNR/2022/0119

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 14 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 130 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £615.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 March 2023

3. The amount included for services is/is negligible/not applicable ---------- Per ----------

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st August 2012

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Landlord and Tenant Act

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises A self contained first floor flat comprising entrance hall, lounge/dining room, kitchen, 1 double bedroom, 1 single bedroom, bathroom with bath and hand wash basin. Separate WC. Double glazing. Electric heating. Single garage

[NAME] of Decision 24/03/2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £615.00 per month.
  • The tribunal's decision on the rent took effect on 24 March 2023.
  • The tenancy commenced on August 1st, 2012, for a period of 12 months.
  • The landlord did not provide any furniture for the premises.
  • The property is a self-contained first-floor flat with specific rooms and amenities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £615.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The application of the Housing Act 1988 was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No specific evidence or documents are mentioned in the judgment.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.