VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a tenant's assured shorthold tenancy. The rent was set at £1900 per month, starting from May 30, 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured shorthold tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.22

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant of an assured shorthold tenancy to apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of rent if certain conditions are met. These conditions include that the rent is significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain, considering the rents of similar properties in the area. Additionally, applications cannot be made if the rent has already been determined under this section or if the tenancy falls under specific exceptions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1900 per calendar month, effective from 30 May 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BK/MDR/2022/0006

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 22

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge [NAME]

[ADDRESS] & [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1900.00 Per Calend ar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 May 2022

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 16 November 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Shorthold assured

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement and Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord The flat is fully furnished including white goods and microwave.

9. Description of premises The premises are a flat within a purpose built block, comprising 2 rooms and 2 bathrooms and kitchen.

Chairman Judge Daley Date of Decision 30th May 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £1900 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 22 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument focused on the statutory requirements for setting rent under the Housing Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.