VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They confirmed the monthly rent at £855.00, excluding water rates and council tax. The decision also clarified the responsibilities of the landlord and tenant regarding repairs and service charges.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 Section 14Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.11

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. It also includes keeping installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation in proper working order, as well as installations for space heating and heating water.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy and outlined the responsibilities of both the landlord and tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, confirming the monthly rent at £855.00 excluding water rates and council tax. The decision also addressed service charges and repair liabilities under relevant legislation.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BE/MNR/2019/0115

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 11B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 855.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 08 October 2019

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable NA Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 08 October 2018

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A bedsit with WC and shower. There is a shared kitchen facility but the single room lounge has no furniture. No furniture is permitted in the lounge by the landlord. No utility offered by room.

[NAME] Date of Decision 3rd December 2019

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set the monthly rent at £855.00 for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and a tenant.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, which outline the responsibilities of landlords and tenants.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the relevant legislation to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the relevant legislation to determine their rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant legislation.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.