Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £740 per calendar month, considering the property's condition and market comparables.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and market comparables, setting the rent at £740 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HN/MNR/2018/0071
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] 860 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 740.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 December 2018
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 December 2004
5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Some floor coverings
8. Description of premises A detached bungalow with 3 rooms on the ground floor plus kitchen, bathroom and separate wc, with attic bedroom above. Garage, gardens front & rear, gas fired central heating, neglected.
[NAME] of Decision 10 December 2018
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HN/MNR/2018/0071 Property : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Decision in relation to Housing Act 1988
Date of Decision : 10 December 2018
Reasons for the decision Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 760.00 in place of the existing rent of £725.00 per month to take effect from 10 December 2018.
2. On 10 October 2018 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
3. On 16 October 2018 the Tribunal made Directions requiring the landlord to send a statement to the tenant and to the Tribunal supporting the application for an increase in rent. The Tenant was also required to send a statement to the Landlord and to the Tribunal in support of his objection.
4. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of an inspection of the property and written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing and an inspection was arranged.
2
5. Representations were received from the Tenant as referred to below. Nothing was received from the Landlord.
Inspection
6. The Tribunal inspected the property as arranged in the company of the tenant. The property is a detached bungalow with single garage attached. There is a driveway parking and small gardens front and rear with a narrow concrete pathway to one side.
7. The accommodation comprises an entrance hall, an undecorated front bedroom, a living room at the rear with landlord’s gas fire, a dining room with open riser stairs leading to the attic bedroom, a bathroom with panelled bath, pedestal wash basin and heated towel rail, a separate WC and a kitchen with a door to the back garden. The kitchen units were installed by the landlord in 2016. Central heating and hot water is provided by an Alpha combi boiler. Outside is a single garage with recently replaced doors.
8. Externally the property appears to be in somewhat dilapidated condition with missing tiles to the rear elevation and a section of slipped roof tiles adjoining the garage. A section of rendering was missing adjacent to the new garage doors. There is however double glazing and reasonable paintwork. The gutters appear to leak in places and are missing from (or not provided to) the front of the porch over the entrance door. Internally there are signs of damp throughout. The front room and the wall between the rear living room and kitchen are particularly affected together with the WC cubicle where the skirting has rotted through.
9. The bedroom carpet is of some age and in need of replacement.
The parties’ representations
10. The tenant sent details of four properties available to let downloaded from “onthemarket.com” which he said had all amenities provided, were in nicer condition and in better areas which were either cheaper or slightly more than he was currently paying.: - (1) A one-bedroom bungalow in Bridport available on a winter let for £625 per month (2) A one-bedroom bungalow in Weymouth available at £625 per month (3) A two-bedroom bungalow at Lydlinch letting agreed with an asking rent of £575. (4) A two-bedroom bungalow at Longburton letting agreed with an asking rent of £795 per month.
11. Mr [NAME] says that repairs are needed and some Health and Safety issues need to be addressed.
The law
3
12. S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (c) (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (d) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
4 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Determination
13. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
14. Mr [APPELLANT] put forward four properties as comparables all of which were some distance from Bournemouth. As such they provided little assistance in determining a rent for the subject property. Nothing was received from the Landlord.
15. In the absence of any evidence of comparable lettings the Tribunal were obliged to use their own knowledge of general rent levels for this type of property and in doing so considered that a rent of £985 per calendar month could be achieved.
16. For the property to achieve such a rent it would need to be in good condition throughout free of damp and with a fitted kitchen with integral white goods, modern bathroom and WC. It would also be expected to have good quality floor coverings and curtains in good condition.
17. The condition of this property is described above and a prospective tenant would not expect to pay the same rent as where the property is in good condition as described in paragraph 13.
18. To reflect this lower bid that a prospective tenant would make the Tribunal makes a deduction of 25% and arrives at a rent of £740 per calendar month.
[NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] [NAME] 10 December 2018
5
PERMISSION TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Condition…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenanc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent for Flooding and Lack of Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Landlord's Maintenance Failures
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the rent based on its own knowledge of general rent levels for this type of property.
- The property's neglected condition, including damp and missing roof tiles, justified a lower rent.
- A deduction of 25% was applied to the market rent to reflect the property's poor condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord failed to provide any evidence of comparable lettings to support the proposed rent increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £740 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to the market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and market comparables mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
