First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy by comparing it to similar properties in the area. The decision was based on open market rates rather than the tenant's personal financial situation.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market rate for similar properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the periods of the existing tenancy and takes into account the terms of the tenancy except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on open market rates.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on open market rates, taking into account comparable properties and disregarding the tenant's personal circumstances.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/29UH/MNR/2020/0039 Property : 27 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Decision in relation to Housing Act 1988
Tenant
Landlord
: :
[APPELLANT] [NAME] of Decision : 21st July 2020
Reasons for the decision
2 Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £668.09 per month in place of the existing rent of £628.93 per month to take effect from 1st April 2020. The current rent included £8.63 Personal Water Usage for her home and Fixed Service Charge of £132.33
2. The tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy from 8th October 2012. A copy of the tenancy agreement was included in the bundle.
3. On 29th March 2020 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant under Section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 25rd March 2020.
4. On 19th May 2020 the Tribunal made Directions informing the parties that in view of the Governments advice with respect to the Covid-19 outbreak an inspection would not take place. The parties were given the opportunity to provide supporting photographs of the property and if desired make representations to have the case stayed until an inspection was possible.
5. The Directions required the Landlord to send a statement to the Tenant and to the Tribunal supporting the application for an increase in rent. The Tenant was also required to send a statement to the Landlord and to the Tribunal in support of her objection.
6. Upon receipt of the additional papers from the parties it was found that further information was required from the Landlord and this was received on 17th July 2020.
Information 7. The matter is dealt with as a paper determination without hearing. In the current circumstances it has not been possible to inspect the property and the Tribunal relies on submissions from the Landlord and Tenant in correspondence, publicly available housing data online and its own expert knowledge.
8. Tenant’s submissions. In her original application Miss [APPELLANT] said the rent had steadily increased on a yearly basis during the course of her tenancy. The 6% increase year on year is significantly more than her wages had risen.
9. She felt the rent was unreasonable considering it was only a one bedroomed flat without balcony or garden area.
10. She lives alone and has sole responsibility for all the bills.
11. Having seen the Landlord’s submissions, she made further comments.
(1) They have only offered one comparable – [ADDRESS]. (2) She is being charged more for her water than Flat 5.
3 (3) They advise they are responsible for replacing carpets and the oven, but in the 7 years she has been in the flat the carpets have not been replaced even though she has made a couple of requests. (4) There have been no major repairs other than a couple of plumbing repairs. (5) There has been no upgrade to any of the fixtures & fittings. (6) Consequently, her living conditions remain the same as when she started her tenancy. (7) When she moved in the Landlord gifted her the washing machine and fridge freezer, so consequently she is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of these which is reflected in her rent.
12. Landlord’s submissions. The Landlord set out the breakdown of the new basic rent, Personal Water for the flat and fixed service charge in an e-mail to the Tenant dated 16th June 2020. This was included in the bundle.
Monthly rent 510.01 £ Personal Water Usage 29.17 £ Fixed Service Charge Administration Charge for Home Services 4.38 £ Administration Charge for Communal Services 16.24 £ Fire Safety Equipment Repairs to Furniture & Equipment 1.10 £ Services provided by other agents 93.34 £ Personal Furniture & Equipment for your home 13.85 £ 128.91 £ monthly rent 668.09 £
13. A copy of the tenancy agreement for [ADDRESS] was included. It commenced on 1st June 2018. On Page 2 under the Heading “Payment for the Premises” three elements of rent were listed –Net monthly rent was £481.20, the Service charge was £141.96, Water Services Charge was blank. It is not specific as to whether this is a Fixed or Variable Service Charge. It goes on to say “The total monthly charge will include any other charges as shown above. In this Agreement the term Rent or monthly charge refers to the sum of the Net Rent plus Service Charges and any Water Charges. If no amount is shown for Water Service Charges then that item is not payable to the Landlord. However, the Tenant will be liable to the provider of water services to pay charges as required.”
14. Attached to the agreement for Flat 5 was a Schedule of Service Charges. It includes an amount of £17.53 und the heading “Personal Water for your Home”. Whilst the other elements are similar to those of the subject Flat, they differ slightly and in addition there is a further item “Fire Safety Equipment” amounting to an additional sum of £1.62.
4 15. A budget and Unaudited accounts for the year ending 31st May 2019 for [COMPANY] were enclosed, as were copies of Service Charge and Water Charge demands for the flat addressed to the Landlord.
16. A Rightmove “Best Price Guide” was attached to the bundle. It gives the best data and local market trends to help tenants understand how the rent is set. It uses an area within ¼ mile radius of the subject property in the period 15th March to 15th June 2020. It gives at least 5 comparable 1 bedroomed properties, either to let or under offer, with rents ranging from £700 to £800 per month. Most of these have parking facilities for one car.
The Law
17. S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a Tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting Tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the Tenant, if the improvement- was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (c) (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose
5 by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (d) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the Tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a Tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the Tenant (or, in the case of joint Tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the Tenant to the Landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Determination
18. The Tribunal has considered the representations of both parties.
19. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
20. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
21. In determining the appropriate rent, the Tribunal would disregard any improvements made under the existing tenancy.
22. The Landlord’s evidence from Rightmove is indicative of rent levels for open market rents let on Assured Shorthold Tenancies in the normal letting market, with no additional costs recoverable for Service Charges. In such cases tenants are directly responsible to the suppliers for Water, drainage and Local authority taxes.
23. In this instance the tenancy includes a sum for Fixed Service Charge and Personal Water Usage.
6
24. The Landlord’s comparison of Flat 5 was not helpful as it was not clear if the Service Charge was variable, and in any instance the items chargeable differed to the subject property.
25. The budget and year accounts were not relevant to the Tribunal because the tenancy pays a fixed service charge.
26. Section 14(1)(c) of the Act deems this tenancy to be subject to a non-variable service charge and consequently section 14(4) provides that the Rent determined by the Tribunal will include sums payable for this non-variable service charge in the Rent it registers. Non-variable service charges are commonly known as Fixed Service Charges.
27. The Tribunal decides the rental value of the flat in good repair and condition would have a market rental value of £750.00 per month.
28. The Tribunal finds that some allowance should be made for the ageing carpets and the fact that the tenant is liable for some of the white goods which would normally be included in a modern tenancy of this age of property. Also, the landlord has failed to deal with the tenant’s request to replace the ageing oven, hob and extractor fan. It assesses that a 10% reduction would be appropriate.
29. The Tribunal therefore determines that the rent payable from 1st April 2020 being the date stated in the notice is £675.00 per month inclusive of Fixed Service Charge, but exclusive of Water Charge.
[NAME] [NAME] TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
7 4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UH/MNR/2020/0039
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 27 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
[NAME] PO Box 2070, Preston, Lancashire, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2020
3. The amount included for services is £128.91 Per Calendar Month
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 08 October 2012
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Third floor flat – 1 bedroom, bathroom/WC, living room, kitchen, car parking space.
[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 21 July 2020
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Ground Floor Flat
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rental value of the flat in good repair and condition to be £750.00 per month.
- The Tribunal considered that a 10% rent reduction was appropriate due to aging carpets, the tenant's liability for white goods, and the landlord's failure to replace the oven, hob, and extractor fan.
- The landlord's Rightmove evidence was used to indicate open market rent levels for similar properties.
- The tenancy includes a fixed service charge and personal water usage, which are part of the rent determination.
- The determined rent includes sums payable for the non-variable service charge.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent at £675 per month, including a fixed service charge but excluding water rates.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant challenging a rent increase proposed by the landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on open market rates for similar properties, ignoring the tenant's personal circumstances.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the proposed rent to open market rates.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may challenge a rent increase by showing that the proposed rent is higher than what similar properties are renting for.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included comparable property rents and the tenant's statements regarding the property condition.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
