VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £2,100 Monthly

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2,100 per month starting from November 2024, following the rules under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application must meet certain conditions, such as the rent not being previously determined under this section and less than six months having passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £2,100 per month effective from November 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BY/MNR/2024/0683

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 9 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[ADDRESS], [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] (Liverpool) t/a [NAME], Liverpool [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2,100.00 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 November 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 26 March 2019

5. Length of the term or rental period 26.03.19 to 25.09.19 followed by statutory monthly tenancy from 26.09.19

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement of 26.03.19 and s. 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Three-bedroom, two-bathroom, second-floor apartment within the Ashbury Brook development on [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Liverpool, with open-plan kitchen, dining and lounge area, balcony, garage space and storage area.

[ADDRESS] of Decision 22 May 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's right to have their rent assessed under the specified act.
  • Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 is invoked successfully by tenants.
  • Tenants can rely on section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to challenge their rent.
  • The Housing Act 1988 provides a clear pathway for tenants to seek rent determination.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £2,100 per month starting from November 2024.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for determining rent for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set according to the statutory requirements.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and the relevant sections of the Housing Act 1988 were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.