VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £510 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £510, excluding some charges like water rates and council tax. This decision helps tenants understand what they need to pay each month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £510 per calendar month excluding certain charges. The decision took effect on 18 October 2020.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2020/0044

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

I D Jefferson FRICS K Usher

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £510.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 October 2020

3. The amount included for services is: not applicable

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 May 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Yes. Bunk bed + 1xmattress, Carpets to 2 x Bedrooms + Living Room, 2 x wardrobes (1 in disrepair), Dining tables & 3 chairs, Double Bed, TV, 2 x Sofas, curtains, cooker, fridge, and washing machine.

9. Description of premises Ground Floor mid-terrace Tyneside flat, built around 1900, internal accommodation comprises, 1 Reception, 2 x Bedrooms, Kitchen, Bathroom.. Central Heating and Double-glazing.

Tribunal Judge Mr ID Jefferson Date of Decision 16 February 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.
  • The new rent was set at £510.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the new rent took effect on 18 October 2020.
  • The landlord provided several items of furniture, including a bunk bed and a double bed.
  • The premises are a ground floor mid-terrace Tyneside flat with two bedrooms.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £510 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which allows the Tribunal to determine the rent for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect the rent for their assured periodic tenancy to be determined similarly.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.