VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £675 Monthly

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £675, which took effect on May 13, 2019. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which was applied in this case to set the monthly rent at £675.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determinations

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent that a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £675 per month, excluding certain charges but including others as specified in the tenancy agreement.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £675, effective from May 13, 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/MNR/2019/0069

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] 90 - 92 Parkway, Regent's Park, London, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 May 2019

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 January 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises 1960’s 1 bedroom first floor flat in a 3 storey block without lift. Living room /kitchen, bathroom/wc.

Chairman C [NAME] of Decision 19 July 2019

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is seeking a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.
  • The request for rent determination is made under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant's application for rent determination is in line with the provisions of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's entitlement to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The Housing Act 1988 explicitly grants tenants the right to have their rent determined.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided similar cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £675, effective from May 2019.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent to be paid for an assured periodic tenancy, specifically whether the proposed rent of £675 per month was appropriate.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £675 per month, effective from May 2019, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine a fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.