VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £680 Monthly

Case No.

📌 In brief

The tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £680 per month, effective from November 2020, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, specifically for an assured periodic tenancy in a 3-bedroom detached house.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent of their assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide a fair rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £680 per month, effective from November 2020.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £680 per month, effective from November 2020.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2020/0038

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord’s [RESPONDENT] 2a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £680.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 November 2020

3. The amount included for services is N/A Per N/A

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 2009

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises 3 bedroom detached house with garage

[NAME] of Decision 19 October 2020

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £680.00 per month.
  • The new rent decision takes effect from November 1, 2020.
  • The property is a three-bedroom detached house with a garage.
  • The tenancy agreement started in 2009.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £680 per month, effective from November 2020.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about setting the rent for a 3-bedroom detached house with a garage.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £680 per month based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, allowing the rent to be set at £680 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the relevant legislation.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.