VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £719.25

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £719.25, which includes some services but excludes water rates and council tax. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, specifically for an assured periodic tenancy starting June 23, 2017.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy excluding the rent amount. Additionally, certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or non-compliance with tenancy terms are disregarded when determining the rent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £719.25 per month, effective from June 23, 2022.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £719.25 per month, effective from June 23, 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00GF/MNR/2022/0030

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME], Acton Gate, Stafford, Staffordshire, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £719.25 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 June 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable --- Per ---

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 June 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 LTA 1985 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable 9. Description of premises 3 storey end terrace house comprising lounge, kitchen, 3 bedrooms, bathroom (master bedroom with ensuite)

[NAME] of Decision 23 June 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the monthly rent to be £719.25, excluding water rates and council tax.
  • The decision on the rent determination took effect on 23 June 2022.
  • The assured tenancy for the premises commenced on 23 June 2017.
  • The premises are described as a 3-storey end terrace house with specific rooms including an en-suite master bedroom.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £719.25 per month, effective from June 23, 2022.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £719.25 per month, effective from June 23, 2022, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.