VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £225 weekly rent for assured tenancy in Birmingham

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £225, excluding some charges such as water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which was applied in this case to determine the rent for a three-bedroom terraced house.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the type of tenancy, the start date, and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £225 per week, effective from 6 November 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the weekly rent at £225 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0252

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 14 Northgate, Harborne, Birmingham, [POSTCODE]

[NAME]. (Est. Man.) [NAME]. [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £225 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6.11.23

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 6.4.92

5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly Periodic

6. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.

8. Description of premises Three bedroom terraced house.

[NAME] of Decision 24.1.24

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £225 per week.
  • The decision on the rent took effect on November 6, 2023.
  • The property is a three-bedroom terraced house.
  • The tenancy commenced on April 6, 1992, as an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs under section 11 of the Housing Act.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £225 per week, effective from 6 November 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Harborne, Birmingham.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £225 per week, effective from 6 November 2023, based on the provisions of the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set at £225 per week.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.