VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1700, starting from November 1, 2021. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 22.

Topics

rent determinationassured shorthold tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.22

Under the Housing Act 1988 Section 22, a tenant can apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of the rent if the rent is considered excessively high compared to similar properties in the area. The tribunal will decide if the rent is significantly higher than what the landlord could reasonably expect to get for similar assured tenancies.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy under the Housing Act 1988 Section 22. The rent was set at £1700 per calendar month, effective from November 1, 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2021/0151

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 22

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 65B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st November 2021

*3. The amount included for services is

negligible

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 14 August 1995

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Tenancy Agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.

9. Description of premises 2 bedroom self-contained flat with kitchen, bathroom/WC and living room, shared garden

[NAME] of Decision 8th December 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £1700 per month.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for determining rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 22 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory requirements for setting rent under the Housing Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.