VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4171343

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) made a decision regarding the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £800, effective from October 1st, 2019. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the terms agreed upon in the tenancy agreement, as applied in this case involving a ground floor double bedroom with shared facilities.

Topics

rent determinationassured shorthold tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.22

Under the Housing Act 1988 Section 22, a tenant can apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of the rent if the rent is considered excessively high compared to similar properties in the area. The tribunal will consider whether there are enough comparable properties and whether the rent is significantly higher than what could reasonably be expected.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £800, effective from October 2019.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy under the Housing Act 1988 Section 22. The decision took effect on 01 October 2019, setting the monthly rent at £800 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MDR/2019/0006

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 22

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 40B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Ms [NAME] [NAME] BA (Hons) DipLaw LLM Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] 133 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 October 2019

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 02 May 2018

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Tenancy Agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed, sofa and 2 waredrobes.

9. Description of premises Ground floor double bedroom with shared use of kitchen and bathroom.

[NAME] BA (Hons) DipLaw LLM Date of Decision 15th November 2019

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the premises to be £800.00 per calendar month.
  • The new rent decision took effect from October 1, 2019.
  • The tenancy agreement started on May 2, 2018, for a period of 12 months.
  • The landlord provided a bed, sofa, and two wardrobes as furniture.
  • The premises were described as a ground floor double bedroom with shared kitchen and bathroom facilities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for the assured shorthold tenancy was set at £800 per month, effective from October 2019.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for the assured shorthold tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £800 per month based on the terms of the tenancy agreement.

Which laws or rules were applied?

No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the terms of the tenancy agreement regarding the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, likely the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the terms of their tenancy agreement.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.