Tribunal confirms £1200 rent for assured shorthold tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal confirmed the rent at £1200 per month for an assured shorthold tenancy after reviewing evidence of similar rental properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent under their assured shorthold tenancy, as determined by the tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy to apply to a tribunal for a determination of a fair market rent. The tribunal will consider whether there are enough similar properties in the area and whether the current rent is significantly higher than what could reasonably be expected for those properties.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal confirmed the rent at £1200 per month after considering comparable rental evidence.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal confirmed the rent at £1200 per month for an assured shorthold tenancy based on comparable rental evidence from the locality.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BA/MDR/2021/0010
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 22
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr A Harris LLM FRICS FCIArb
Landlord London and [COMPANY] 29-35 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1200 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 March 2021
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 27 February 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 and 12 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Second floor flat 3 rooms kitchen bathroom. The flat has central heating, double glazing and white goods.
Chairman A Harris Date of Decision 17 August 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
LON/00BA/MDR/2021/0010 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : In House Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s22 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
Mr A Harris LLM FRICS FCIArb
Date and venue of hearing : 17 August 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 17 August 2021
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are the submissions from both parties the contents of which the tribunal have noted Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1200.00 (one thousand two hundred pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 following the grant of an Intermediate market rent 12 month fixed term assured shorthold tenancy for 12 months beginning on 27 February 2021 at a commencing rent of £1200.00 per month. The property 2. The subject property is a 2nd floor flat with accommodation consisting of 3 rooms kitchen and bathroom/WC. The flat has central heating and double glazing.
3. The Tenant’s evidence 4. The tenant’s evidence includes details of minor disrepair including loose radiators and some mould in the bathroom. The tenant also complains of limited hot water storage. No curtains were supplied but white goods are included. The landlord’s evidence 5. The landlord has supplied details of various flats in the area at rents from £1500 per month to £1600 per month.
The Law 6. The Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant, in the first 6 months of a tenancy, to apply to the tribunal for a determination of the rent which in the tribunals opinion the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the assured shorthold tenancy.
7. In so doing the tribunal may not make a determination unless (a) they consider that there is a sufficient number of similar dwelling houses in the locality let on assured tenancies (whether shorthold or not) and (b) that the rent payable under the AST in question is significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the tenancy having regard to the level of rents payable under the tenancies referred to in paragraph (a) Valuation 8. The landlord has supplied rental evidence but no rental evidence has been put forward by the tenant.
9. The tribunal considers that the number of comparables supplied by the landlord demonstrates that there is a sufficient supply of dwellings let on assured tenancies in the locality.
10. The tribunal further considers that the rental evidence does not show that the rent under the current tenancy is significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the tenancy in the market. The tribunal is not able to make a determination of the rent.
11. The tribunal therefore confirms the rent under the tenancy at £1200.00 per calendar month.
Name: A P Harris LLM FRICS FCIArb Valuer Chair Date: 17 August 2021
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Housing Act 1988
22 Reference of excessive rents to appropriate tribunal. (1)Subject to section 23 and subsection (2) below, the tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy may make an [NAME] in the prescribed form to the appropriate tribunal for a determination of the rent which, in the appropriate tribunal’s opinion, the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the assured shorthold tenancy. (2)No [NAME] may be made under this section if— (a)the rent payable under the tenancy is a rent previously determined under this section;
(aa)the tenancy is one to which section 19A above applies and more than six months have elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy or, in the case of a replacement tenancy, since the beginning of the original tenancy; or (b)the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy falling within subsection (4) of section 20 above (and, accordingly, is one in respect of which notice need not have been served as mentioned in subsection (2) of that section). (3)Where an [NAME] is made to the appropriate tribunal under subsection (1) above with respect to the rent under an assured shorthold tenancy, the appropriate tribunal shall not make such a determination as is referred to in that subsection unless they consider— (a)that there is a sufficient number of similar dwelling-houses in the locality let on assured tenancies (whether shorthold or not); and (b)that the rent payable under the assured shorthold tenancy in question is significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to be able to obtain under the tenancy, having regard to the level of rents payable under the tenancies referred to in paragraph (a) above. (4)Where, on an [NAME] under this section, the appropriate tribunal make a determination of a rent for an assured shorthold tenancy— (a)the determination shall have effect from such date as the appropriate tribunal may direct, not being earlier than the date of the [NAME]; (b)if, at any time on or after the determination takes effect, the rent which, apart from this paragraph, would be payable under the tenancy exceeds the rent so determined, the excess shall be irrecoverable from the tenant; and (c)no notice may be served under section 13(2) above with respect to a tenancy of the dwelling-house in question until after the first anniversary of the date on which the determination takes effect. (5)Subsections (4), (5) and (8) of section 14 above apply in relation to a determination of rent under this section as they apply in relation to a determination under that section and, accordingly, where subsection (5) of that section applies, any reference in subsection (4)(b) above to rent is a reference to rent exclusive of the amount attributable to rates. (5A)Where— (a)an assured tenancy ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy by virtue of falling within paragraph 2 of Schedule 2A to this Act, and
(b)at the time when it so ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy there is pending before the appropriate tribunal an [NAME] in relation to it under this section,
the fact that it so ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy shall, in relation to that [NAME], be disregarded for the purposes of this section. (6)In subsection (2)(aa) above, the references to the original tenancy and to a replacement tenancy shall be construed in accordance with subsections (6) and (7) respectively of section 21 above.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Northampton Property at £1000 pcm
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Deci…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Confirms Rent at £1841.66 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Assessment for Assured Shorthold Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decisio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant applied for a determination of fair market rent under their assured shorthold tenancy.
- The tribunal assessed the rent based on local market conditions and comparable properties.
- The rent was considered significantly higher than what would be reasonable under market conditions.
- The tenant invoked the Housing Act 1988, specifically Sections related to rent determination.
- The application was made when the existing rent was deemed unreasonable compared to the market.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal confirmed the rent at £1200 per month for the assured shorthold tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on evidence of similar rental properties in the area, confirming the rent at £1200 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 22, was applied to determine the fair market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the evidence of similar rental properties in the area, showing that the rent was reasonable.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, confirming the rent at £1200 per month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence of comparable rental properties in the area to support their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of similar rental properties in the area mattered in determining the fair market rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
