Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area to determine a fair rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the conditions and terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and comparable rents in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AX/MNR/2019/0154
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 126 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] First Floor Front Offices Nightingale House, 1 - 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1150 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 December 2019
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 May 2012
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Ss 11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises 8th floor purpose built flat wit 2 bedrooms, reception room, kitchen, bathroom and WC
[NAME] of Decision 2 February 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AX/MNR/2019/0154 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : 126 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : [NAME] of [NAME] : Market Rent under ss13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 2 February 2022 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 2 February 2022
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are the notice of increase, the [NAME] and covering correspondence from the Tenant the contents of which the tribunal have noted Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1150.00 (one thousand one hundred and fifty pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice of increase dated 1 March 2019 proposing a new rent of £1150.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £925.00 per month to commence on 1 December 2019. The tribunal issued directions on 9 December 2021 The property 2. The subject property is an 8th floor purpose built flat with accommodation consisting of 3 rooms kitchen and bathroom/WC. The flat has central heating and triple glazing. The Tenant’s evidence 3. No evidence was submitted by the Tenant The landlord’s evidence 4. Written evidence was submitted by the Landlord including details of re- cladding work replacement of windows and provision of a new balcony costing £75,953 stop 5. Details were submitted of a number of flats in [ADDRESS] available to let on the open market.
6. A two-bedroom flat flat available to let at £311 per week (£1347.67 pcm) although the date of the details is not shown.
7. A flat in [ADDRESS] available to rent at £1200 per month. The date is not shown nor the accommodation.
8. A flat available to let in [ADDRESS] at £1250 per month again the accommodation is not shown nor the date.
9. Details were also included of other properties including houses and flats in the general locality but not in the specific development. These details were all dated November 2021.
10. A number of references from other tenants of the landlord were included but these are not directly relevant to the matter before the tribunal.
11. The Landlord also included an email setting out details of arrears of rent and complaints from the Estate management company relating to goods left in the communal area outside the flat. The email also acknowledged that the kitchen and bathroom needed updating but that access was refused and the Applicant had changed the locks.
12. Details of repair work carried out to the flat were provided including electrical work and gas safety work. The Law 13. Section 14 the Housing Act 1988, allows a tenant who has received a notice of increase to apply to the tribunal for a determination of the rent which in the tribunal’s opinion the rent at which the dwelling might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as the tenancy, beginning at the beginning of the notice period and on the same terms other than the amount of rent as are contained in the tenancy. Valuation 14. No rental evidence has been provided by the Applicant. The Respondent has provided limited rental information but lacking important details such as the date of the comparable and the accommodation. The tribunal was able to place little weight on this. In consequence the tribunal relies on its knowledge and experience.
15. The tribunal considers that this flat, let in the market on an AST on normal market terms in the condition the market would expect including carpets, curtains and white goods would achieve a rent of £1250.00 per month. The
tribunal has deducted £7.5% to reflect their lack to reach a rent of £1156 per month which is rounded down to £1150.00 per month.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 10 March 2022
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £490 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the market rent for the flat to be £1150 per calendar month.
- The tribunal relied on its own knowledge and experience to determine the rent.
- The tribunal considered the flat's condition, including carpets, curtains, and white goods, when assessing market rent.
- A deduction of 7.5% was applied to the initial market rent assessment to reach the final figure.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not submit any evidence to support their case.
- The landlord's submitted rental information was given little weight due to missing important details.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court relied on its knowledge and experience, considering the property's condition and comparable rents in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and compare it to similar properties in the area when determining a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
