VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £1,385 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

market rentassured periodic tenancywritten submissions

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,385 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT] Fu

1. The rent is: £ 1385.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 December 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 October 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises Upper floor 2 bedroom flat with balcony.

[NAME] of Decision 24 January 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280 Property : 44 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenants : Mr [COUNSEL] and Mr [COUNSEL] Fu Representative :

None

Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

24th January 2024

DECISION

CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280

2

Summary of Decision 1. On 24th January 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,385 per month to take effect from 1st December 2023.

Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 10th September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,385 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,110 per month to take effect from 1st December 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 24th November 2023 the Applicant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 18th December 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates which were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 24th January 2024 based on the written representations received.

9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be

CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280

3 expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280

4

The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a 5th floor corner flat within a modern multistorey block of similar properties which overlooks the river Itchen as it enters Southampton harbour. All main amenities are available in the city.

11. The accommodation is said to comprise 1040 sq. ft. arranged as a Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom with ensuite Bathroom, Bedroom 2, second Bathroom and to have a large outside terrace.

12. There is electric heating and double-glazed windows. The Energy Performance Rating is ‘B’. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 1st October 2022 at a rent of £1,100. The Landlord states that carpets, curtains and white goods are all included.

14. In his submission the Landlord states that he manages a number of flats within the block and gives details of 12 flats all let within the last 6 months at rents ranging from £1,285 to £1,495. This includes 42 Hawke House which is 100 sq. ft. smaller than number 44 and is let at £1,495 per month and 14 Parker House which is 10 sq. ft. larger than number 44 and is let at £1,495.

15. The Landlord states that there is off street parking.

16. In their submission the Tenants state that curtains are not included and there is no off-street parking but there is permit parking. The Tenants also refer to a water leak into their Living Room, illustrated by a photograph, which has not been repaired.

17. The Tenants also state that since taking occupation another block of flats has been constructed which partially obscures their view across the river and also state that building works are expected to commence shortly to the cladding and balconies of the tower which are due to take more than 12 months and that whilst the works are being carried out, they will not be able to use their balcony.

18. The Tenants also supply details of other properties to let in the general area at rents ranging from £1,100 to £1,300 per month. Consideration and Valuation 19. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

20. The Tribunal would have preferred some clarity from the Parties regarding the parking arrangements for the property. However, the Tribunal was provided with details of rents achieved for 12 flats within the same block all let in the last 6 months and might reasonably assume that some or all of these would have

CHI/00MS/MNR/2023/0280

5 similar parking arrangements and would also be subject to any blight from the proposed building works.

21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy at today’s date. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

22. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Portsmouth the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,385 per month.

23. The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination 24. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,385 per month.

25. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,385 per month should take effect from 1st December 2023, this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The rent adjustment must reflect the property's condition and the landlord's obligations.
  • Tenants can refer a notice of rent increase to the Tribunal for determination.
  • The Tribunal determines the fair market rent based on the Housing Act 1988.
  • Improvements made by the tenant to the property are taken into account.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a market rent of £1,385 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on written submissions from both parties, without holding a hearing.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The arguments regarding the current and proposed rent levels were crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, setting the rent as proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may expect a fair market rent to be set based on comparable properties and written submissions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs illustrating the condition of the property and details of recent rental agreements in the same block were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if permission is granted.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.