First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,325 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 27 May 2024, after reviewing the landlord's proposal and the tenant's objections.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, as determined by the First-tier Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
This rule allows landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent for an assured periodic tenancy, provided the notice meets certain conditions regarding timing and form.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,325 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 27 May 2024.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,325 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 27 May 2024, after considering the landlord's notice of rent increase and the tenant's objection.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Long Rock, Penzance, Cornwall, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1325 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 27 May 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 March 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises 3 bedroom semi-detached house.
[NAME] of Decision 31 July 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134 Property : [ADDRESS] Rock Penzance Cornwall [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenants : [NAME] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : Miller Countrywide Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
31st July 2024
DECISION
CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134
2
Summary of Decision 1. On 31st July 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,325 per month, to take effect from 27th May 2024.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 22nd April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,350 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,275 per month to take effect from 27th May 2024. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 23rd May 2024 the Tenants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued Directions on 26th June 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. The Tenants submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their case. The papers were also copied to the Landlord.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 31st July 2024 based on the written representations received.
9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the
CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134
3 Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in
CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134
4 subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a modern semi-detached house, built about 8 years ago, situated within a cul-de-sac of similar properties about 2 miles east of the centre of Penzance and about 250 yards from the coastal path. There is a small modern light industrial estate immediately adjacent.
11. The accommodation has gas-fired central heating and double-glazed windows and comprises an open plan Living Room/Dining Room/Kitchen, Cloakroom, 3 Bedrooms – one with en-suite Shower Room, and a Bathroom with WC. Outside there are modest gardens and nominated car parking.
12. The Energy Performance Rating is ‘B’. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 27th March 2021 at a rent of £1,150 per month.
14. The Tenants provided photographs taken at the beginning of the Tenancy which show the property to be well appointed and in good order. A cooker, washing machine, dishwasher and carpets are all provided by the Landlord but no fridge or curtains.
15. There is a small damp stain on one ceiling from an old leak in the Bathroom above. The leak has been repaired 16. The Tenants refer to comparable properties to rent in the area within a range of £1,000 to £1,200 per month.
17. The Landlord submitted no evidence of comparable rents. Consideration and Valuation 18. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
19. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. Such a letting would normally include carpets, curtains, cooker, fridge and washing machine provided by the landlord.
20. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.
21. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence, and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Penzance area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject
CHI/00HE/MNR/2024/0134
5 property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,350 per month.
22. This open market rent needs to be adjusted to reflect the Tenant’s provision of curtains and fridge. The Tribunal decided that a deduction in the rent of £25 per month should be made to reflect this.
23. The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination 24. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,325 per month.
25. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,325 per month should take effect from 27th May 2024, this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £800 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Listed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,290 for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Listed Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determines the market rent based on the condition of the property and comparisons with similar properties.
- The tenant can challenge a landlord's rent increase notice through the First-tier Tribunal.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
- The Housing Act 1988 provides the framework for determining a fair market rent.
- Improvements and maintenance of the property can influence the determination of market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new market rent of £1,325 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on written representations, considering the property's condition and comparable rents in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may face a higher rent if they object to a landlord's proposed rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and comparable rent data were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if permission is granted.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.
