VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2,400 per month after considering the property's condition and market value.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for its condition.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the specific conditions and terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property specifics.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2,400 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the open market value and the condition of the property. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/MNR/2025/0685

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 92 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] 89 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[APPELLANT], [NAME] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2,400 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 February 2025

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 August 2009

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises An end of terrace three storey Victorian house with loft conversion, parking on the frontage and a rear garden. Accommodation comprises : 5 bedrooms, bathroom, living room, dining room, kitchen, cloakroom.

[NAME] of Decision 7 October 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AF/MNR/2025/0685

Property : 92 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] [NAME] & [NAME]

Landlord : [COUNSEL] : [COUNSEL] of Objection : 7 February 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 7 October 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,400 per calendar month with effect from 10 February 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 6 February 2025 which proposed a new rent of £2,600 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,200 per month to take effect from 10 February 2025. This being an increase of £1,400 per month

2. On the 7 February 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. On the 24 July 2025, the Tribunal determined that it has jurisdiction to make a decision in the matter and the case was set down for consideration following the issue of further directions.

4 Following correspondence from the Tribunal, the landlord confirmed the tenants vacated the property on the 28 May 2025 and possession was obtained following a court order and the Landlord confirmed that she wished the Tribunal to proceed to determine the application. This request was agreed to by the Tribunal.

3. The parties did not request a hearing to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The parties, however requested an inspection which was undertaken on the 7 October 2025. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of the inspection, the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has received a completed statement from the parties together with submissions in connection with the history of the tenant’s occupation. The parties did not provide any evidence in connection with comparable rental evidence in the area.

The Inspection

5 The property was inspected on the 7 October 2025 in the presence of the landlord’s agent. The property was vacant, and it is confirmed the tenant vacated the house on the 30 May 2025 following a court order.

Determination and Valuation

6. Therefore, having consideration of the written evidence provided by the parties and the Tribunal’s own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Bromley area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in

3 good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £2,600 per month. This is based upon the configuration of the rooms, the

7. The Tribunal considered the submissions from the parties and based upon the inspection we consider a deduction of £200 per month should be applied to take into account the configuration of rooms, the slightly dated fittings and the small rear garden. This reduces the rental figure to £2,400 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £2,400 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2,400 per month to take effect on the 1o February 2025. This being the date in the Landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 7 October 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal had the authority to make a decision in the matter.
  • The landlord wanted the tribunal to proceed with the application even after the tenants vacated.
  • The tribunal determined the open market rent for the property in good condition would be £2,600 per month.
  • A deduction of £200 per month was applied due to the property's configuration, dated fittings, and small garden.
  • The new rent of £2,400 per month was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £2,400 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property and its condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a rent determination based on the open market value and the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included statements from both parties, inspection reports, and market data.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.