Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £461.60 per week for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and market value to determine the rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value adjusted for the property's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and market value.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's state.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £461.60 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market value. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AY/MNR/2024/0137
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord London & [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 461.60 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st April 2024
*3. The amount included for services is
negligible
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 5th May 2024
6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A converted ground and first floor flat forming part of a three storey end of terrace Victorian building. Accommodation comprises: three bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, living room, garden. At the time of inspection scaffold was erected on the rear wall.
[NAME] of Decision 19th September 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAY/MNR/2024/0137
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant : Miss [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 4th March 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 19 September 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £461.60 per calendar Week with effect from 1 April 2024. ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 29 January 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £169.64 (including £10.35 for services) per week in place of the existing rent of £150 per week which was decided by the Tribunal on the 12th December 2023, to take effect from 1st April 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement which commenced on the 5 May 2014.
2. On the 4th March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal arrived at the property on the 19th August 2024 at around 11.am in the presence of the tenant.
Evidence
4. Following Directions prepared by the Tribunal on the 6th June 2024. The Tenant provided the Tribunal with the decision dated 12th December 2023.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Brixton area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £577 per week
6. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the damp and mould in the bedrooms and bathroom, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, which equates to approximately 20% (£115.40)
Decision
6. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £461.70 per calendar week.
3
7.The Tribunal directs the new rent of £461.70 per week to take effect on the 1st April 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.
8. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.
Chairman: [NAME]: 19 September 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Property Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for New Property - Tenant Wins
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting the open market value.
- The rent determination should be adjusted for the property's condition.
- Adjustments can be made for minor defects in the property.
- Rent adjustments should consider the amenities provided in the property.
- The rent determination should take into account the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new rent of £461.60 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, as required by the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent reflects the current market value and the condition of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and comparable market rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
