First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy. They considered the current market conditions and the state of the property. The rent was set at £1,650 per month, starting from June 28, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value considering the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay. However, this application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. When a tenant makes such an application, the tribunal must decide on a rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy based on market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy based on market conditions and the state of repair of the property. The rent was set at £1,650 per month, effective from June 28, 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/MNR/2025/ 0847
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge S [NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] 108 DORCHESTER WAY HARROW [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1,650 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 June 2025
*3. The amount included for services is
not applicable
Per
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 28.10.17
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Sofa, beds, washing machine and dryer.
9. Description of premises The property is a ground floor flat in a three-storey residential block containing six flats. It contains a kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms.
MR22 [NAME] of Decision 30.09.25
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AE/MNR/2025/0847 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] Type of Application : Determination of a Rent under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge S [NAME] [NAME] and Venue of Meeting
: 30 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Written Reasons : 30 September 2025
DECISION
Decision of the Tribunal Background
1. On 30 July 2025, the [APPELLANT] of [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the property”) referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2 2. The landlords’ notice, which proposed a rent of £1,900 per month with effect from 28 June 2025, is dated 20 May 2025.
3. The previous rent was £1,550 per month.
4. The [APPELLANT] holds the property under the terms of an assured shorthold tenancy dated 27 October 2017. Section 11 of the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985 applies to the lease.
5. Neither party request a hearing or an inspection.
The property
6. The property is a ground floor flat in a three-storey residential block containing six flats. It contains a kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms. The landlord provides a sofa, beds, washing machine and dryer.
7. The [APPELLANT] complained in 2022 that the kitchen sink was leaking, causing damage to the bathroom wall and floor tiles, and that there was inadequate heating resulting in damp mould in the bedrooms. A surveyor at that time noted that some repairs had been carried out and estimated the cost of repairs at £1,150.
8. In the application notice the [APPELLANT] says that problems persist but she give no real details.
The law
9. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
Valuation
10. A first floor flat in the same block available later this month is on the market at £1,725 per month, with a likely agreed price at £1,675 per month. The comparable local range is £1,725 to £1,900 per month. But flats at the higher end are in better condition, more modern and with an extra bathroom.
11. Based on our knowledge and experience, a comparable property which was let on an assured shorthold tenancy in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting, would attract a rent of £1,675.00 per month.
12. We make a reduction of £25 per month for the lack of repair, resulting in a figure of £1,650 per month.
The decision
3 13. The Tribunal therefore concludes that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market would be £1,650.00 per month.
14. This rent will take effect from 28 June 2025, being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
[RESPONDENT] [NAME]: 30 September 2025 _____________________________________________________
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Property Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for New Property - Tenant Wins
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,950 Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should reflect the open market value of the property.
- The property's condition must be taken into account when determining rent.
- Local rental values influence the fair market rent.
- Financial circumstances of the tenant can affect the rent determination.
- Disrepair issues and minor defects should adjust the rent appropriately.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured shorthold tenancy was set at £1,650 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties in the market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market conditions when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents in the market were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
