Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the rent for a property based on its condition and compared it to similar properties in the area. They set the rent at £135.00 per week, effective from 18 October 2021.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the actual condition and market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the same terms and conditions as the original tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property based on its condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property based on its condition and market comparables, setting the rent at £135.00 per week, effective from 18 October 2021.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UE/MNR/2021/0119
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 65 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY] c/o [RESPONDENT] & [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 135.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 October 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 May 2004
5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Small 2 bedroom terrace house in need of modernisation.
[NAME] of Decision 30 November 2021
1
Case Reference
: CHI/29UE/MNR/2021/0119
Property
: 65 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Application
: 13th October 2021
Type of Application
: Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act
1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 30th November 2021
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 30th November 2021 in the sum of £135.00 per week (pw).
2. By an application dated 13th October 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 5th September 2021 proposed a rent of £152.00 pw (£659.00 pcm) with effect from 18th October 2021, in place of the current rent of £136.00 pw (£590.00 pcm).
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The current tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 17th May 2004. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 27th October 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a residential area.
8. The property comprises a gas centrally heated part double glazed terraced house.
9. The accommodation comprises: Ground Floor: 1 reception room, kitchen and bathroom. First Floor: 2 bedrooms. Outside: garden. No off street parking.
10. The property is let unfurnished but with original carpets, curtains.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 27th October 2021.
14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application Forms.
3
Landlord's Representations (summarised): 16. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and in a statement by [RESPONDENT] (Director of landlord company):
a) The Tower Hamlets area of Dover is predominantly residential situated to the west of the A526. The property is 10 minutes walk from Dover Priory railway station.
b) The rent was last increased in July 2017 to the current rent £136.00 per week.
d) The proposed increase to £152.00 pw was calculated by reference to the RPI Index and remains cheap in comparison to other 2 bedroom properties in the Landlord's portfolio. If the latest published figure was used the rent would be £166.00 pw.
e) For comparison other 2 bedroom properties: on Rightmove:
[ADDRESS], Dover £158.77 pw (£688.00 pcm).
[ADDRESS], Dover. £158.75 pw (£635.00 pcm).
[ADDRESS], Dover £178.85 pw (£775.00 pcm).
f) Attached are photographs of the subject property and the comparables given above.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised) 17. In the Application Form the [APPELLANT] confirmed the details of the accommodation.
18. In the statement the [APPELLANT] says: a) The property is very small. b) Condition of carpets is poor dating from 2004. c) Only 50.00% of the property is double glazed. e) Property has poor insulation EPC Rating E. f) Bathroom and kitchen fittings are basic and at least 17 years old. g) The exterior is in poor conditional and has not been decorated in 17 years. h) The accommodation is dated and falls well short of what could be expected in today's market.
19. One comparable nearby 2 bedroom house at £625.00 pcm (£144.23 pw).
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 20. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
21. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
4
22. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
23. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at E expiring on 7th January 2031. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
24. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in a condition that would be unlikely to appeal to a prospective [APPELLANT].
25. The Tribunal does not accept that the use of the RPI as an indicator of an increase from existing rent to current market rent is an accurate method of assessment.
26. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating above F would be £160.00 pw.
27. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property (as shown in the Landlord's photographs), made the following deductions:
a) Lack of cooker, fridge, washing machine: £5.00 pw. b) Lack of floor coverings and curtains: £5.00 pw. c) General disrepair (as detailed above) and including poor insulation, low EPC, dated bathroom and kitchen: £15.00.
28. A total deduction of £25.00 per week.
29. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £135.00 pcm.
30. The rent will take effect from 18th October 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 31. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
5
32. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £500 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Substandard Property - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: What Tenants Need to Know
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Value
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's small size was a factor in determining its market rent.
- The poor condition of the carpets, dating from 2004, was considered.
- The fact that only 50% of the property was double-glazed contributed to the rent determination.
- The property's poor insulation and EPC Rating E were factors in the rent assessment.
- The dated bathroom and kitchen fittings, at least 17 years old, influenced the rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's use of the RPI Index to calculate the rent increase was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £135.00 per week, effective from 18 October 2021.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, considering factors like the property's age and condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties in the area were crucial arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent lower than the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined based on the condition of their property and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and comparable properties were important evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they have a valid legal basis.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to consult a solicitor for advice on how to proceed with a case like this.
