VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Set for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £435, excluding water rates and council tax. This decision follows the procedures outlined in the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to statutory procedures.

Topics

rent assessmentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £435 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00EH/MNR/2024/0156

Notice of the Rent Assessment Committee Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

I Jefferson K Usher

Landlord’s Name Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT], 5-7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £435.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in para 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 May.2024

3. The amount included for services is Not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 September 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Per Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

None.

8. Description of premises

Small mid-terrace house built around 1900, comprising 1 Reception, Kitchen, and Bathroom to Ground Floor and 2 Bedrooms to the First Floor. Radiator central heating and double-glazing.

Chairman I Jefferson Date of Decision 8 July 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent to be £435.00 per calendar month.
  • The new rent decision takes effect from 21 May 2024.
  • The landlord is not responsible for providing furniture.
  • The property is a small mid-terrace house with two bedrooms.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £435.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the statutory procedures under the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory procedures for rent assessment.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should follow the statutory procedures for rent assessment.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The statutory procedures and relevant documentation were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.