VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal has set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £600, excluding water rates and council tax, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The decision takes into account the type of tenancy, the start date, and any relevant notices given under certain grounds.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £600 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/99BM/MNR/2024/0697 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Judge J [NAME] Landlord [APPELLANT]. Address c/o 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £600.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15th August 2024 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13th July 2023 5. Rental period monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Nil 8. Description of premises First floor rear room in shared house. Converted end terrace house - 7 rooms with communal kitchen and lounge. Chairman J Stringer Date of Decision 4th April 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair determination of their rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to statutory procedures.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £600, excluding water rates and council tax.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for setting rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on setting rents.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant sections of the Housing Act 1988.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.