Residents' Association Certified as Recognised Tenants' Association
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal certified a residents' association as a recognised tenants' association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. This means the association can now manage service charges for the tenants.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenants' association qualifies for recognition if it meets the statutory requirements set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📖 What the law says
A 'recognized tenants' association' is an organization of qualifying tenants (which can include other types of tenants) recognized either through a written notice from the landlord to the association's secretary or through a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal for properties in England.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal certified a residents' association as a recognised tenants' association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal certified a residents' association as a recognised tenants' association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 after the landlord failed to respond to the association's request for recognition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BN/HTA/2023/0003 Property : 8 MALVERN GROVE, WEST DIDSBURY, [APPELLANT] Applicant : [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : For a certificate pursuant to section 29 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Members : [APPELLANT], LLB A Hossain, Bsc (Est Man) MRICS Date of Decision : 3 June 2024
DECISION 1. The Tribunal certifies that [COMPANY] is a recognised tenants’ association for the purposes of the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Respondent shall pay the Applicant £100 representing the application fee.
REASONS 1. On 15 September 2023 the [COMPANY] was formed by the leaseholders of 4 of the 6 flats in the building known as [ADDRESS], West Didsbury. The
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 remaining 2 flats (numbers 2 and 5) in the building have been retained by the Respondent, which owns the freehold of the property.
2. The 4 leaseholders who are members of the Applicant prepared its Constitution using as a guide the form provided by the [COMPANY].
3. On 16 September 2023 the Applicant’s members sent a copy of the Constitution to the Respondent with a letter requesting that the Respondent recognise the Association in accordance with section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Section 29 (1) provides as follows: “(1) A recognised tenants’ association is an association of qualifying tenants (whether with or without other tenants) which is recognised for the purposes of the provisions of this Act relating to service charges either – (a) by notice in writing given by the landlord to the secretary of the Association, or (b) by a certificate – (i) in relation to dwellings in England, of the First-tier Tribunal;………..” 4. The Respondent did not reply to the Applicant’s request, and on 1 November 2023 the Applicant applied for a certificate of recognition by the Tribunal. An application fee of £100 was paid.
5. Directions were issued on 24 January 2024 requiring the Applicant to serve a Statement of Case, and the Respondent to send a Statement of Case in response. A Statement of Case was duly filed and served by the Applicant along with the required supporting documentation. No Statement of Case was filed by the Respondent. Following a warning order, the Respondent was barred from making representations by order dated 25 April 2024.
6. The Tribunal notes that the Applicant’s Constitution provides: for the composition of its membership, which is formed of leaseholders at [ADDRESS] other than the landlord;
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 for appropriate rules regarding membership: all members are to be qualifying tenants; for appropriate rules regarding decision making and voting; for any fees or charges to be paid in equal shares by the members; for the interests of all members to be taken into account; for the Association to be independent of the landlord; for the Association to have a secretary and [NAME]. In this regard, there is no provision of the Association to have a [NAME]. The Tribunal accepts that in view of the small membership the roles of [NAME] and secretary are effectively combined; for appropriate rules regarding amendments to the Constitution; and for appropriate provisions for the Constitution, accounts and membership lists to be kept up to date and available for inspection. The Tribunal is satisfied that the Constitution is appropriate and that the [COMPANY] operates openly and transparently.
7. The certificate requested by the Applicant is therefore granted.
8. Since there is no apparent reason for the Respondent’s failure to recognise the Association, the Respondent is to repay to the Applicant the application fee of £100.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Residential Property CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION An application from 8 [COMPANY] for a Certificate of Recognition under the provisions of Section 29 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 has been considered by: Judge A. Davies Who is a person appointed under the Act to the panel of persons to act as members of the First tier Tribunal Property Chamber for the Northern Region. This is to certify that [COMPANY] is a recognised Tenants’ Association for the purpose of the aforementioned section. The Certificate will be valid for a period of five years from 3 June 2024. Judge A. Davies 3 June 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Recognises Burne Jones House Tenants Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Fire Safety Works Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Tenant Association Recognition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Work
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Not Liable for Service Charges After RTM Company Acquires Management…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Repairs Approved Without Full Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Costs for Renewing External Surfaces Are Recoverable via Service Charge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Fire Safety Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Roof Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Recovery of Energy Consumption and District Hea…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenants' association meets the statutory requirements set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- A landlord may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if it is reasonable and no relevant prejudice would be suffered by leaseholders.
- Service charges for certain expenses, like energy consumption, may not be recoverable under the service charge provisions of the lease.
- A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if there are good reasons for doing so.
- It is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements under s.20ZA when there are serious health, safety, and environmental concerns.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to certify the residents' association as a recognised tenants' association.
Who was involved?
The tenants' association and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the certification because the association met the statutory requirements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 29.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The association's constitution met the statutory requirements for recognition.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants' association.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can apply for certification if their association meets the statutory requirements.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The association's constitution and the lack of response from the landlord were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only if there are grounds to appeal the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
