Tenant Granted Right to Buy Freehold Under Leasehold Reform Act
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided that a tenant could buy the freehold of their property for £20,588. The decision was based on a valuation report submitted by the tenant's lawyer.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to acquire the freehold of their property under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold of a property in Thornton Heath, Surrey.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the price to be paid into court for the purchase of the freehold of a property in Thornton Heath, Surrey, setting the amount at £20,588. The decision was based on a valuation report submitted by the applicant's representative.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: VG/LON/OOAH/OCE/2021/0108
Property : 96 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
HMCTS Code : P: Paper
Applicant: [redacted] [NAME] : [APPELLANT]
Respondent: [redacted] : None
Type of [NAME] : Enfranchisement
Tribunal Members:
Judge Robert Latham
Marina Krisko FRICS
Date and venue of : Paper determination on 27 July 2021 Hearing
: [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Date of Decision : 27 July 2021
________________________________
DECISION ________________________
Description of Hearing This has been a hearing on the papers (“P”). The Directions provided for a paper determination and neither party has requested an oral hearing. This is a missing [RESPONDENT] case. There has therefore been no appearance by the Respondent. Pursuant to these Directions, the Applicant has provided the Tribunal a Bundle of Documents including a valuation report.
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Summary of Decision
(1) The Tribunal determines that price to be paid into court in respect of purchase of the freehold of 96 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] is £20,588.
(2) The Tribunal approves the draft proposed transfer in form TR1 which has been submitted by the Applicants.
Background
1. On 6 May 2021, Deputy District Judge Redpath-Stevens, sitting in the County Court at Mayors and City of [ADDRESS], made an order pursuant to Section 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 ("the Act") dispensing with the requirement to serve an initial claim notice under section 13 to acquire the freehold in 96 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the “Property”) in the Applicant. The Judge ordered that the matter be transferred to this Tribunal to determine the premium and the other terms of acquisition.
Evidence
2. We have been provided with a valuation report by Mr [NAME], dated 12 July 2021. He computes the premium to be £20,588. This is a balanced report.
Lease details
3. The Respondent missing [RESPONDENT] is the lessor of the Property which is a part three storey (including loft conversion), part two storey mid terrace Victorian property which has been converted in to two flats:
(i) Flat 96a is located on first floor and loft and comprises staircase from ground floor, landing, reception, dining room and bedroom to the front of the first floor, WC, bathroom and kitchen to rear of the first floor and a landing and two further bedrooms to the loft space. The space in the loft is restricted by the sloping ceilings. Two of the rooms are small. The flat has exclusive use of part of the garden. The GIA of the flat is 95.19 square metres.
(ii) Flat 96b comprises ground floor hallway, reception, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom and has exclusive use of part of the garden. The GIA of the flat is 54.18 metres.
Both flats are accessed via a communal hallway at ground floor level. To the front of the property is a block paved driveway with parking for two cars. This area is not demised to the lessees. The Property is located in Thornton Heath.
3
Valuation date
4. The valuation date is 11 November 2020, namely the date of the [NAME] to the Court (s.27 (1) (b)).
Hypothetical Unimproved Freehold Value of the Flats
5. Mr [NAME] has identified 8 comparables, namely (i) [ADDRESS]; (ii) [ADDRESS]; (iii) Flat 6 Braidwood House; (iv) Flat 2, 45, [ADDRESS]; (v) [ADDRESS]; (vi) [ADDRESS]; (vii) [ADDRESS]; and (viii) [ADDRESS]. He does not provide details of the comparables. Having assessed the comparables and adjusted for the size, location and layout of the subject flats he has applied the following freehold rates:
(i) £3,250 per square metre to the three bedroom Flat 96A which is situated on the first floor and loft level. He computes a freehold value of £310,000.
(ii) £4,600 per square metres to the one bedroom Flat 96B which is situated on the ground floor. He computes a freehold value of £250,000.
The aggregate freehold value is £560,000.
Capitalisation Rate
6. Mr [NAME] has adopted a capitalisation rate of the ground rent of 5.5%. We approve this.
Deferment Rate
7. We approve the “Sportelli” rate of 5% for deferment which Mr [NAME] has adopted.
Relativity Rate
8. The leases are for terms of 99 years from 27 January 2003, with unexpired terms of 81.20 years. The unexpired terms of both leases are more than 80 years, and therefore marriage value is not a relevant factor in the premium.
Appurtenant Land
9. There is a block paved driveway to the front of the property with parking space for two cars. This area is not demised to the leaseholders and there are no rights within the leases for the leaseholders to use the driveway. It is therefore available for the freeholder to rent out. Mr [NAME] has identified a driveway of similar size in the road let out at £91 per month. He has applied a multiplier of five. He assesses the valuation of this area of land at £4,550.
4
Calculation of the Premium
10. Mr [NAME] computes the basic premium for the Property to be £16,038, to which he has added an additional payment of £4,550 for the Appurtenant Land. The Tribunal has checked his calculation and approve it. He apportions this figure as follows: (i) Flat 96a: £11,027; (ii) Flat 96b: £9,561.
11. The Tribunal approves the draft proposed transfer in form TR1 which has been submitted by the Applicants at pp.243-5 of the Bundle.
Judge Robert Latham 27 July 2021
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Premium for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Collective Enfranchisement Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Price Set at £8,060 in First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Transfer Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Enfranchisement Premium Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Acquisition Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Approved: Premium Set at £12,200
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines £12,426 Premium for Collective Enfranchiseme…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Premium Under 1993 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Acquisition Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Values Freehold Interest for Tenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Lease Extension in Missing Landlord Case
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to acquire the freehold of their property under the relevant act.
- The claim involves a residential property.
- The conditions for acquiring the freehold are met according to the act.
- The tenant seeks to extend their lease under the same act.
- Other tenants have successfully acquired their freeholds under the act.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the price for the tenant to buy the freehold of their property at £20,588.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the missing landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court approved the valuation report submitted by the tenant's representative, which calculated the price based on comparable properties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation report provided by the tenant's representative was crucial in determining the price.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to acquire the freehold of their property through the same process.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation report was the key document used to determine the price.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving freehold acquisition.
