Tenant's Application for Rent Repayment Order Dismissed Due to Non-Attendance
📌 In brief
The tenant's application for a rent repayment order was dismissed because they did not attend the hearing and did not respond to the tribunal's messages asking when they could attend an online hearing.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant cannot obtain a rent repayment order without presenting evidence and attending the hearing.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's application for a rent repayment order was dismissed due to non-attendance and lack of response.
📜 Headnote Official document
In a case heard by the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber, the claimant's application for a rent repayment order was dismissed due to non-attendance and lack of response to the tribunal's queries.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Struck Out
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOAQ/HMF/2022/0213 Property : 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] :
Respondents : [redacted] :
Type of application : Rent Repayment Order Tribunal : Judge Shepherd Fina Macleod MCIEH Date of Directions : 3rd March 2023
DETERMINATION.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
1. This case was heard on the 3rd of March 2023. The Applicant contacted the tribunal on the 1st of March 2023 to say that she was unwell and to ask the
2
Tribunal either to decide the matter on the papers or to adjourn the case. She did not provide any medical evidence confirming that she would not be able to attend a hearing online. The Tribunal wrote back to the Applicant to ask her when she would be able to attend an online hearing with a view to possibly adjourning the hearing today. The Applicant did not respond to this message and therefore it was considered a possibility that she would actually attend the hearing. In the event she chose not to attend and not to respond to the query by the Tribunal. Faced with a case in which there is no Applicant the tribunal decided to dismiss her application. If the Applicant considers that she had a good reason for not attending the hearing and not replying to the Tribunal it is open to her to make an application to set aside the decision striking out her application.
2. The Respondent and her husband did attend the hearing and the Tribunal asked the respondent some questions about the case in particular the alleged unlawful eviction. Whilst the tribunal only heard from one side our preliminary view is that it would be difficult for the Applicant to satisfy a Tribunal beyond reasonable doubt that she would be entitled to a rent repayment order based on alleged harassment and unlawful eviction. It is important to stress however that this matter has not been properly tried with cross examination on both sides. On a practical note the Respondent told the Tribunal that she wanted the Applicant to remove her possessions which were taking up space. The Applicant would be well advised to recover her possessions even if she wishes to retain an action against the Respondent.
Judge Shepherd
3rd March 2023
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL Appealing against the tribunal’s decisions
1. A written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional tribunal office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional tribunal office within 28 days after the date this decision is sent to the parties.
3. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The application for permission to appeal must state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. All applications for permission to appeal will be considered on the papers
3
5. Any application to stay the effect of the decision must be made at the same time as the application for permission to appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Statutory Lease Extension Granted Where Landlord Cannot Be Found
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Right to Manage Claim Under 2002 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Allows Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Works Exemption
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Awarded Compensation for Property Encroachments
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Pitch Fee Clarified and Assignment Validated in First-tier Tribunal Decisio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Permission to Purchase Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Ref…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant is entitled to a Rent Repayment Order if landlord operated an unlicensed HMO.
- Tenant is entitled to compensation for encroachments on their property under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
- Service charge demands must comply with statutory requirements and be reasonable in cost.
- Emergency works to stabilize a retaining wall can be exempted from consultation requirements if it is reasonable to do so.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Tenant cannot obtain a rent repayment order without presenting evidence and attending the hearing.
- Tribunal must allow an appeal out of time only if satisfied that there is a good reason for the failure to appeal within the 21-day period.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The claimant's application for a rent repayment order was dismissed.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to dismiss the application because the tenant did not attend the hearing and did not respond to the tribunal's messages.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The fact that the tenant did not attend the hearing and did not respond to the tribunal's messages was the most important factor.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they attend the hearing and respond to any messages from the tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Medical evidence confirming the tenant's inability to attend the hearing would have been relevant.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the tenant can apply to set aside the decision if they believe they had a good reason for not attending the hearing.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal proceedings.
