Tenant's Application Struck Out Due to Invalid Notice
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed a tenant's a person because the notice proposing a new rent was not given in the correct format as required by law. The a person was struck out due to procedural issues.
⚖️ Legal holding
The case was struck out because the notice served by the landlord failed to follow the prescribed form under the relevant tenancy legislation.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The application can be made within six months of the start of the tenancy or to contest a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The case was struck out due to serious flaws in the notice served by the landlord, which did not conform to the prescribed form under the relevant tenancy legislation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal struck out an application for a market rent determination due to the invalidity of the notice, which failed to follow the prescribed form under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Struck Out
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BR/MNR/2022/0203 Property : 24 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : N/A Respondent : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] & Ms [COUNSEL] of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent – S.14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge L. F. McLean Tribunal Member [NAME] of Determination : 5th May 2023 Date of Decision : 5th May 2023
DECISION
2
Decisions of the Tribunal
(1) The Tribunal strikes out the Applicant’s [NAME] dated 24th November 2022.
The [NAME]
1. The Applicant has referred a Notice proposing a new rent under an Assured Tenancy to the Tribunal, in respect of 24 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (“[NAME]”). The Applicant is the tenant of [NAME]. According to the written tenancy agreement, the landlord of [NAME] is [RESPONDENT], and the Respondent is the landlord’s managing agent.
Relevant Law
2. The relevant sections of the Housing Act 1988 read as follows:-
13 Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies
(1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period.
(2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic tenancy— (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and
(c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14 below— (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date.
(3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months;
3
(b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy.
(3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect.
(3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and (b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect.
(4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to the appropriate tribunal; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied.
(5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
14 Determination of rent by tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
4
(2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(3A) In [NAME] a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament ( “the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the appropriate tribunal shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded.
(3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act.
(4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of
5
the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
(5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a superior landlord, the appropriate tribunal shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne.
(6) In any case where— (a) the appropriate tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the appropriate tribunal propose to hear the two references together, the appropriate tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before [NAME] their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection(1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference.
(7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
(8) Nothing in this section requires the appropriate tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end.
(9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
Jurisdiction and Strike Out
3. The Notice to which this [NAME] relates was dated 25th October 2022 and served on the Applicant by the Respondent. However, the Notice did not
6
follow the form prescribed by the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003, as amended from time to time. Paragraph 3 of the prescribed form of notice was omitted, which is supposed to contain the date of the first statutory increase after 11th February 2003. Paragraphs 6 to 18 of the Guidance Notes were also omitted and some of the wording appeared to be carried over from a superseded version of the prescribed form. These are not trivial or inconsequential errors but are serious flaws which mean that the Notice was not given “in the prescribed form” as required by Section 13(2) of the Act.
4. As no notice was given under Section 13(2), the Notice cannot have been referred pursuant to Section 14 of the Act and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the [NAME]. The Tribunal is obliged to strike out the [NAME] under Rule 9(2)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.
5. The Tribunal Members take this opportunity to record their observation, for the benefit of the parties’ understanding, that the Notice is invalid and accordingly there has been no valid increase of rent – a new notice would need to be served afresh.
Name: Tribunal Judge L. F. McLean Tribunal Member [NAME]: 5th May 2023
Rights of appeal
1. By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
2. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.
3. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
4. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
5. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
7
6. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,950 Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £750 Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £2,350
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Large West London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Open Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Reduced Rent Due to Property Deficiencies
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Service Charge Challenge Due to Uncontested Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Invalid Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Application Due to Defective Notice
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
- The Tribunal must consider the rent based on the open market value of the property.
- The rent should reflect the financial circumstances of the tenant.
- The Tribunal evaluates the rent at which a property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market.
- The tenant can challenge improvements made during the tenancy when requesting a rent adjustment.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's application for a determination of a market rent was not based on a notice given in the prescribed form.
- A tenant cannot challenge a service charge increase if the rent is not contested.
- A tenant's application for review of a defective notice of rent increase is outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to strike out the tenant's application for a market rent determination.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord's managing agent were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to strike out the application because the notice proposing a new rent was not given in the prescribed form.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the notice was not given in the prescribed form.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that any notice proposing a new rent is given in the prescribed form.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The notice proposing a new rent was the key document.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal procedures.
