VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal confirms £2,250/month rent for assured tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,250, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, for an assured periodic tenancy, as seen in this case involving a two-storey maisonette.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application can't be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £2,250 per month, effective from 21 September 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £2,250, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0282

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge P Korn Judge M [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT], 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2,250.0 0 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 September 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 11 August 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Initial fixed term of 2 years and then continuing as contractual periodic tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished.

9. Description of premises Two-storey maisonette being part of a terraced four-storey purpose-built block with flat roof. Small front year, reasonable size rear garden. Three bedrooms, bathrooms, two WCS, kitchen, living room, utility room and large storage room.

Chairman Peter Korn Date of Decision 21.09.23

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a determination of their rent under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • All similar cases allowed the tenant's request for rent determination.
  • There are no denying outcomes among the similar cases provided.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No specific factors identified as leading to a decision against the claimant in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,250, excluding certain charges but including others as specified.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy, specifically whether it should be set at £2,250 per month.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £2,250 per month, as required by the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent amount.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set at £2,250 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.