VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for London Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property in London. After considering the property's condition and location, the rent was set at £1,800 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, taking into account the property's condition and location.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding those that are considered relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent, which must take effect at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions regarding when the rent increase can be implemented, depending on the type of tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the market rent for a property in London, considering various factors including the property's condition and location.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in London, considering the property's condition and location. The rent was set at £1,800 per month, reflecting the need for maintenance.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/MNR/2022/0192

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 91 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT], Huntercombe, Nuffield, Henley-on-thames, Oxfordshire, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,800.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 26.01.2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 November 2019

6. Length of the term or rental period 1 Month

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord repairs

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None Detailed

9. Description of premises A purpose built 2 bedroomed fifth floor flat

[NAME] of Decision 26.01.2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : LON/00AE/MNR/2022/0192 Hearing Type : [ADDRESS] of Written Representations

Property : 91 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Member : [NAME], FIRPM

Valuer Chairman

Date of Decision : 23rd March 2023

REASONS

2

REASONS

Background

1. On 11th November 2022 the landlord served a Notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 proposing an increase in the rent of the above property to £1850.00 per calendar month.

2. On 15th November 2022 the tenant made an [NAME] to the Tribunal for the determination of a market rent.

3. By way of a letter dated 30 November 2022 the Tribunal issued directions. these required the Landlord to provide details of evidence on which they wished to rely by 21st December 2022. The Tenant was directed to do the same by 4th January 2023 and the landlord was directed to then make any response thereto by 11th January 2023

4. Submissions were received from both the Landlord and the Tenant.

5. The landlord provided a market report with evidence of rental levels from CBRE surveyors. They confirmed that the flat was approximately 800 square feet in size an that the property was newly built when it was first let to the current tenant in 2016. They also advised that they had marketed the property in 2020 when they had a prospective new tenant willing to take the property at a rent of £1850 per calendar month before agreeing to let to the existing tenant for a further year

6. The tenant provided no evidence but contended that rental levels tended to be agreed at levels below those advertised. The tenant suggested that the second bedroom was not a double bedroom as suggested by the landlord but was a single bedroom and submitted that the flat had received no maintenance since it was let in 2016 and now suffered from a lack of window cleaning , a defective handbasin in the bathroom , broken smoke alarm and a noisy extractor .

7. On 26th January 2023 on the papers and without a hearing, the Tribunal determined that the market rent of the property was £1,800 per month.

8. Subsequently, the tenant requested reasons by way of an email dated 13th march 2023

3

The Law

9. When determining a market rent in accordance with the Housing Act 1988 Section 13, regard must be had to all of the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property, matters contained within the rent, repairing obligations, etc.

The Property

10. From Google Maps and information provided, the Tribunal has found as follows:

The property comprises a purpose built fifth floor flat comprising an dopen plan Lounge/ Kitchen, 2 bedrooms , one with an ensuite bathroom , communal bathroom balcony , parking space / garage and use of communal gardens .

The property benefits from individual gas central heating and double glazing

[ADDRESS] is located on [ADDRESS] and is well placed for local transport and shopping facilities.

11. We understand from the tenant’s correspondence, that the tenant has not undertaken any improvements to the property.

12. The landlord gives no evidence in respect of tenants improvements.

Valuation

13. The Tribunal must firstly determine the market rent for a property of this size, in this location and in its current condition. It must also disregard the personal circumstances of either party. The Tribunal notes the comments made by both the landlord and tenant in their submissions and takes these factors into consideration. In addition to this, the landlord has given evidence that there is a service charge payable in respect of the flat and that this is included in the rent

14. Using its own general knowledge of the Greater London property market, the Tribunal considers that the market rent for a property of this size, in this location, in average condition, with the usual white goods, carpets and decorated to a good condition would be £2,000.00.

15. Taking into account the tenant’s comments, the Tribunal makes allowance for the fact that there are items of maintenance within the flat that now require attention.

4

16. Lastly, the Tribunal notes that within the rent are included service charge (paid for by the landlord). As far as the service charge is concerned, without evidence to the contrary the Tribunal is of the opinion that this relates to the maintenance of the fabric of the building and thus disregards as it is the responsibility of the landlord for most assured shorthold tenancies.

17. The Tribunal therefore makes deductions from the market rent of £200 per month to reflect lack of maintenance undertaken within the flat.

Market Rent: £2,000 per month

• Less 10% for the lack of maintenance

• This leaves a net rent of £1,800 per month.

Name: Mr [NAME]: 23.03.23

ANNEX – RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By Rule 36(2) of the Tribunal procedure, (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they might have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with this case

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the Decision to the [NAME].

If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

5

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.

If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord's proposed rent was reduced because the property had maintenance issues.
  • The Tribunal used its general knowledge of the London property market to determine a base market rent.
  • The tenant's comments about maintenance issues were taken into account.
  • The service charge included in the rent was disregarded because it related to building maintenance, which is the landlord's responsibility.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for a property in London was set at £1,800 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and location and set the rent at £1,800 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 13, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property was a significant factor in setting the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set at a lower rate due to the property's condition.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.