VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has decided on a fair rent for a property. The rent set is £230 per week, excluding certain costs like water rates and council tax but including fuel charges. This decision ensures the tenant pays a fair amount according to the law.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent as determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £230 per week for a property under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/F77/2019/0218

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Lawyer Mrs [RESPONDENT] MA MRICS

Landlord [NAME] Lt

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 230.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 28 February 2020

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

N/A

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £255 per week prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] Lawyer Date of decision 28 February 2020

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 291.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.3

X 291.9 Minus Y 275.3 = (A) 16.6

(A) 16.6 Divided by Y 275.3 = (B) 0.060298

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.110298

Last registered rent* 229.5 Multiplied by (C) = 254.81 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 255

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £255 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £230 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Rent Act 1977 to determine a fair rent that complies with statutory requirements.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring the rent is fair and compliant with the Rent Act 1977 was the central reasoning.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is fair and follows the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the current rental conditions and the relevant statutory requirements.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.