VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £3,000 per Quarter

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £3,000 per quarter for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977. This means the tenant will pay this amount for their rental property, excluding certain costs like water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent as determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £3,000 per quarter for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges. The decision was made on 14 December 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BE/F77/2022/0191

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 23 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord The [APPELLANT] of Deptford Strond

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £3,000.00 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 14 December 2022

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

[NAME] of decision 14th December 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent as determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The rent determination is made by an independent tribunal.
  • The entitlement to a fair rent is clearly stated under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant's right to a fair rent is upheld consistently.
  • The decision is in favor of the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent of £3,000 per quarter for a tenant.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977, setting a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Act 1977 to determine a fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as market analysis and relevant documentation were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.