Tribunal Grants £3050 Drainage Repairs Dispensation for Assured Tenancy in Manchester
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to carry out urgent drainage work without consulting leaseholders first. This was allowed because the work was deemed urgent and necessary to prevent further damage and rising costs.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA if the works are urgent and necessary, as evidenced by a significant increase in repair costs over a short period.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to bypass consultation requirements related to certain works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA due to urgent drainage works costing £3050.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent drainage works. The decision was based on the urgency of the works and the potential for further damage and increased costs if delayed.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference : MAN/00FF/LDC/2022/0042
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : section 20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
Tribunal Members : Mr [APPELLANT] Mr [NAME] ([NAME])
Date : 27 September 2022
DECISION AND REASONS
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2
Decision
1. The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 under section 20ZA of that Act.
The Application
2. On the 13 June 2022 the applicant made an application for dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to urgent works on the drains servicing the property.
3. By directions dated the 11 July 2022 the applicant was sent to the respondents with a direction that any respondent who opposes the application may sent a statement in response to the Tribunal and the applicant within 21 days. That time period was extended to the 22 September 2022 in subsequent correspondence. No respondent has responded to this application.
The Law
4. The Tribunal can grant dispensation under section 20ZA in relation to qualifying works if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements set out in section 20 of the 1985 Act.
Reasons for Granting Dispensation
5. The Tribunal can grant dispensation if dispensation from the requirements to consult is reasonable.
6. We are satisfied that it is reasonable to grant dispensation due to the urgent nature of the works. We note that the applicant obtained a drainage report on the 16 March 2022 which indicated that part of the drainage system was subject to root damage and that the remedial costs for the works would be in the sum of £2200. At that time the applicant decided to delay the works to allow other, more urgent works to proceed, such as repairs to rotting window frames. Following completion of these works, a further drainage report was obtained in June 2022 which indicated a substantial deterioration in the condition of the drain had occurred during the three-month period. By that time the costs had increased to £3050 and it became apparent that the works were urgent and any further delay may result in further damage and increased costs.
7. It follows that we accept that works are urgent and that in all the circumstances of the application, including any prejudice to the respondents, we are satisfied that dispensation should be granted.
3
8. The parties are reminded, as was set out in the directions, that this decision has no bearing on any issues under sections 18 and 27A of the Act as to the reasonableness and payability of any service charge costs resulting from the works.
9. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
P Barber Tribunal Judge 27 September 2022
4
Annex A
Respondent [RESPONDENT] Mr [NAME] Mr & Mrs [NAME] H [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME]
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £15,251.56 Dispensation for Urgent Kitchen Stack Pipe Repai…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal grants urgent lift repairs dispensation in Stortford
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Flue Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £27,799 Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Repairs in Central L…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £29,000 Lift Repairs Without Leaseholder Consultation in Sh…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £37,640 Rainwater Gutter Repairs Dispensation in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £3,100 Expenditure for Urgent Asbestos Removal in London Pr…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal Ca…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Drainage Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £5,000 Damp Works Dispensation for Health and Safety in Nor…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Maintenance Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £12,414.60 Fire Safety Works Dispensation in Central London
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works are deemed urgent by the court.
- The works are considered necessary for the property.
- The works are also seen as reasonable in the circumstances.
- The landlord seeks dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- The court grants dispensation when the works meet the criteria of urgency, necessity, and reasonableness.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors listed as all cases were allowed)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent drainage works costing £3050.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the landlord could proceed with urgent drainage works without consulting tenants first.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the works were urgent and necessary, as evidenced by the substantial increase in repair costs over a short period.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the works were urgent and necessary, as evidenced by the substantial increase in repair costs over a short period.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if their works are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The drainage reports indicating the substantial increase in repair costs over a short period mattered.
