VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Request for Increased Rent

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided to maintain the current rent of £550 per month for a tenant's property, rejecting the landlord's attempt to raise the rent to £850 per month due to issues with the property's condition.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment based on the open market value, considering the condition and amenities of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancyrepair obligations

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market, taking into account the condition and amenities of the property.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. It also includes the installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, as well as space heating and heating water installations.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal rejected the landlord's proposed rent increase, maintaining the current rent of £550 per month.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rejected a landlord's request to increase the rent from £550 to £850 per month, citing disrepair issues and the property's condition. The decision took effect on December 1, 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/MNR/2023/0282

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 184 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 550.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 December 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 July 2017

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed, 2 wardrobes, couch, table, chairs, set of drawers.

8. Description of premises Single attic room with shared bathroom and kitchen.

[NAME] of Decision 30 January 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HB/MNR/2023/0282 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenants : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] D [NAME] Mr [NAME] I [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

30th January 2024

DECISION

CHI/43UG/MNR/2023/0281

2 Summary of Decision 1. On 30th January 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1st December 2023.

Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 21st October 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £850 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1st December 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 29th November 2023 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 18th December 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. The Tenant submitted a bundle of some 242 pages which was also copied to the other party. The Landlord made no submission to the Tribunal.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 30th January 2024 based on the written representations received.

9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be

CHI/43UG/MNR/2023/0281

3 expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

CHI/43UG/MNR/2023/0281

4 The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a single attic room within a converted semi-detached house, itself within a residential area on the southern side of Bristol, about 1 kilometre from the city centre.

11. There are 9 let rooms in the house, 2 shared bathrooms, a separate WC and a shared kitchen. Outside is a small yard to the rear and a lawn to the front which are also shared. Submissions 12. The initial tenancy began on 1st July 2018 at a rent of £450 per month to include service bills and council tax. Furniture was also included comprising a bed, couch, 2 wardrobes, set of drawers, 3 chairs and a table.

13. The Tenant refers to a number of repair issues including black mould in kitchen cupboards, gaps behind the oven where mice have been seen, a large crack to plaster above the oven, a radiator in his room with no temperature control, defects to washbasin and bathroom light, water penetration into his room around Velux window and defective taps. Most serious is an infestation by cockroaches through the past year. He provides photographs and videos of cockroaches in the property and in his room.

14. The Tenant suggests that the Landlord is in breach of his repairing obligations under s11 of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and provides a history of disrepair, including issues from January 2024, with over 70 supporting photographs and over 30 videos which include a historic water leak to his room, exposed electrical wiring, cracked and water damaged plaster, broken furniture, inadequate waste disposal facilities and neglected common areas.

15. The Tenant also supplied the Tribunal with Rightmove details of other small properties to rent in the general area, with many Studios in excellent condition available from £550 per month upwards. Consideration and Valuation 16. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

17. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

18. Having carefully considered the representations from the Tenant and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Bristol the Tribunal decided that there was no evidence to suggest a rent increase in the property was justified.

CHI/43UG/MNR/2023/0281

5

Determination 19. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy remains at £550 month which includes some, albeit damaged, furniture together with utility costs and council tax.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant can refer a rent increase notice to the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the property's condition and the landlord's obligations.
  • A tenant may seek a fair market rent determination by the First-tier Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision maintained the current rent of £550 per month and rejected the landlord's request to increase it to £850 per month.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property and the tenant's claims of disrepair. It concluded that the proposed rent increase was not justified.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's argument regarding the poor condition of the property was crucial in the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge a rent increase if they can demonstrate that the property is in poor condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and videos showing the disrepair of the property were significant in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision can apply for permission to do so within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for assistance with such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.