VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £1560/month rent for assured tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a tenant's property. They set the monthly rent at £1560, excluding some costs but including service charges. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, resulting in a new rent of £1560 per month.

Topics

tenancyfair rentRent Act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new fair rent of £1560 per month for an assured tenancy, applying the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, setting the rent at £1560 per month excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AY/F77/2023/0011

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [APPELLANT] co Ltd

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1560.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 20 March 2023

3. The amount for services is £222.80 Per Calendar Month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

not applicable

Per

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None.

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £1560 per Month including £222.80 per Month for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 20th March 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 360.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 294.3

X 360.4 Minus Y 294.3 = (A) 66.1

(A) 66.1 Divided by Y 294.3 = (B) 0.2246

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 0.2246

Last registered rent* 1559.00 Multiplied by (C) = 1987.10 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1987.50

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services 124.30

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1987.50 Per Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their fair rent determined according to the Rent Act 1977.
  • The maximum fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent reflects the market rent adjusted for the tenant's responsibilities.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new fair rent of £1560 per month for an assured tenancy.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the calculation of a fair rent for an assured tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the fair rent at £1560 per month, based on the calculations required by the Rent Act 1977.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the fair rent using the latest Retail Price Index figures.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting a fair rent of £1560 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be calculated according to the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the exact evidence or documents used in the decision.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.